Register Now.  It's Free!  |  Log In
Classifieds
Automotive
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise
Place An Ad

Home > View from the Newsroom > Archives > 2008 > August > 11 > Entry

Udall’s missed vote

An editorial we published over the weekend has a lot of Mark Udall supporters calling foul.

In it, we said that Udall, after saying he would be on the House floor to vote against adjourning without debating energy legislation, in fact missed the vote.

The people taking us to task point to a House vote to adjourn and note that Udall was there for that vote.

We’re both correct.

Apparently there were two votes for adjournment. The first one, and the most critical, was a vote to decide whether to vote. It passed by one vote. Udall missed it. Had he been there, as he said he would, and had he voted as he said he would have, there never would have been a second vote, the House would still be in session, and we may have had a chance to see how Udall would have voted on domestic energy production.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment |

Comments

By Alan Salazar

August 17, 2008 10:54 AM | Link to this

Mr. Herzog, your description of the House-Senate procedure for adjournment is not quite accurate. Mr. Udall tried to make, but missed a vote that established a three-day period in which adjournment could take place IF the Senate agreed. It was a procedural first step, but I do not think it can fairly be characterized as the “critical vote.” The critical vote for actual adjournment was the final vote, which Rep. Udall did not miss. Nor is it accurate to suggest that had Speaker Pelosi failed on the first vote another vote would not have taken place. That is speculation designed to put Mr. Udall in a bad light but not borne out by the actual history of the House of Representatives. Had Mr. Udall voted and tied the result, I believe most seasoned observers of the House will confirm that another preliminary vote would surely have taken place. The conservative political scholar Norm Ornstein said as much when asked by the Denver Post. So the headline implying that Rep. Udall abandoned his promise is not really fair. Abandonment implies bad faith and bad intentions, neither of which proved up in this case.

Alan Salazar Chief of Staff U.S. Rep. Mark Udall

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Note: Your e-mail address will be displayed.

Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.ajc.com) = text to be linked




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Grand Junction Daily Sentinel Top Cars
Acura TL,3.2L V6 24V SOHC, Midsize Car...(more) 
Dodge Ram 2500 Truck,5.9L V8 16V, Standard Pickup Truck...(more) 
Hyundai Elantra,2.0L I4 16V DOHC...(more) 
Pontiac Grand Prix,3.8L V6 12V, Midsize Car...(more) 
Ford Excursion 2001. 7.3L, 8 CYL., Automatic, DI, Estate Green Cc Metallic. Call (970)241-5370...(more) 
Ford Five Hundred,3.0L V6 24V DOHC 200 hp 193 lb-ft torque, Large Car...(more) 
Pontiac Sunfire 1996. 2.2L, 4 CYL., Automatic, FI, Red. Call (970)241-5370...(more) 
Pontiac G6,3.5L V6 12V MPFI OHV, Midsize Car...(more) 
-View All Top Cars-
-Place an Ad-
 

Grand Junction News | Grand Junction Weather | Sports | Business News | Opinions | Classifieds | Sitemap
Grand Junction Cars | Grand Junction Real Estate | Grand Junction Jobs

Copyright 2008 Grand Junction Newspapers, Inc. All rights reserved. - The Daily Sentinel - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy.
To report content corrections, email corrections@gjds.com or to report
classified advertising corrections, email classified@gjds.com
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ