Register Now.  It's Free!  |  Log In
Classifieds
Automotive
Real Estate
Employment
Merchandise
Place An Ad

Home > Political Notebook > Archives > 2008 > October > 06 > Entry

Roberts: Poll results don’t reflect Referendum O’s chances

EllenRobertsinGovsOfficePNPIc.jpg

Referendum O’s low polling numbers in a recent survey are more evidence of the polling method than the measure’s level of support, state Rep. Ellen Roberts, R-Durango, told Political Notebook today.

A poll release last week showed the measure polling with the support of 38 percent of registered voters. The poll showed 26 percent of registered voters opposed to it and 30 percent of registered voters unsure. (The other 6 percent said they would not vote either way on the measure.)

“I think for those who make their way all the way through (the ballot), it will make sense,” said Roberts, one of the ballot question’s prime supporters.

She said a telephone poll, which quickly summed up the ballot measure, might not reflect how people actually vote, reading the ballot measure at or before heading to the polls.

(The polling question read: “Referendum O is a constitutional amendment that decreases the number of signatures required to place a statutory initiative on the ballot, and increases the number of signatures required to place a constitutional initiative on the ballot. It requires that eight percent of signatures for constitutional initiatives be gathered from each congressional district and that drafts of proposed constitutional initiatives be submitted for review earlier in the year. It extends the time period for collecting signatures for statutory initiatives, increases the number of votes required for the legislature to change a statutory initiative for five years after the statute takes effect, and allows the public and state legislators to comment on initiatives at a public meeting. On Referendum O, will you …”)

Roberts said that information could be a bit much to digest over the phone.

What do you think?

*Roberts photo shot by Political Notebook.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment |

Comments

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Note: Your e-mail address will be displayed.

Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.ajc.com) = text to be linked




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 


Grand Junction Daily Sentinel Top Cars
Ford F-150,5.0L V8 16V...(more) 
Ford Mustang 2001. 4.6L, 8 CYL., Standard, FI, Silver. Call (970)241-5370...(more) 
Dodge Magnum 2005. 3.5L, 6 CYL., Automatic, FI, Black. Call (970)241-5370...(more) 
Jeep Cherokee,4.0L I6 12V...(more) 
Contact Luke Uhlman at (719) 375-9725, Phil Long Ford Chapel Hills, for more information....(more) 
Ford Ranger,4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC, Standard Pickup Truck...(more) 
Ford Five Hundred,3.0L V6 24V DOHC 200 hp 193 lb-ft torque, Large Car...(more) 
Contact Luke Uhlman at (719) 375-9725, Phil Long Ford Chapel Hills, for more information....(more) 
-View All Top Cars-
-Place an Ad-
 

Grand Junction News | Grand Junction Weather | Sports | Business News | Opinions | Classifieds | Sitemap
Grand Junction Cars | Grand Junction Real Estate | Grand Junction Jobs

Copyright 2008 Grand Junction Newspapers, Inc. All rights reserved. - The Daily Sentinel - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy.
To report content corrections, email corrections@gjds.com or to report
classified advertising corrections, email classified@gjds.com
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ