Amonette verdict disturbs Rifle cop, DA

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*


Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

OK, the criminal is a criminal which means he is breaking the law.  So you believe him that it was an accidental shooting?  Jurors, you screwed up on this one.  If he was pointing the gun and shooting at you (jurors) would it still be an accident?  If that officer hadn’t been wearing a vest, it would have been murder.  Would you then have ruled it an accidental shooting??

Not Freida Cook:  At a relative .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

I can understand the Officer’s concern with the verdict.  It sounds like the jury must have slept through the trial.  Suspect points a gun at the Officer, pulls the trigger and what the hell do the jurors think his intent was?  God save us from such juries?



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy