Civil unions, at last

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*

Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

I am “appalled at the fact that,” people encourage and promote moral destroying practices of homosexuality and adultery. The people involved in these practices should not be discriminated against but that doesn’t change the fact that such practices are offensive to others!

Most of the hassle over things like civil unions for gays and abortion stem from a lack of understanding of the very real mechanical differences between God’s (Nature’s) free-will-based laws and man’s human-pecking-order (aka “govt”), coercion-based “laws”.
God’s law and man’s law are like oil and water. Their mechanics are exactly opposite.
God’s voluntary-compliance cause-and-effect laws are love-based, free-will based, individualism-based and protect all individuals (1) equally, (2) separately, and (3) simultaneously, in other words, the so-called “Golden Rule” and “Ten Commandments” which have been wisely paraphrased as “don’t do to anyone else that which you wouldn’t want done to you.” Even atheists should be able to live with that concept, which some of them like to call “The Non-Aggression Principle”, since the mathematics of the equation are pragmatically the same for atheist and Christian alike, regardless of the nomenclature.
In direct polar contrast, humankind’s deception-based, fear-based, and coercion-based laws by definition and necessity inevitably pit the “legal” rights of one individual or group against the “legal” rights of another individual or group in the following dialectic perfectly exemplified by the abortion “issue”:  the child’s right to life (thesis) versus the mother’s right to privacy (antithesis). Under this paradigm, after spending huge amounts of money on lawyers for going into their courts, fraudulently called “the people’s courts”, a phony illusion (e.g. Roe v. Wade) of genuine resolution and harmony is arrived at (synthesis). This subtle and complex scam is known as the Hegelian dialectic, a means by which clever individuals create and manage social crises for the purpose of gaining power and money to benefit themselves.
I have long favored civil unions as a strategic antidote to gay propaganda manipulation of the definition of the word “marriage”.
I am fed up with the propaganda which is based on rhetorical brinksmanship and demonization of dissent as “hate”.
If radical gay propagandists had their way, they would eliminate the 1st Amendment and criminalize my opinions with which millions (if not tens of millions) of Americans agree: It just so happens that I believe that smearing feces on one’s urethra (aka “sodomy”) is disgusting and medically risky. I also believe that rectums were designed (or evolved) for the expulsion of waste, not the expression of romantic love.
I don’t remotely “hate” gays. I’m just not going to be intimidated into agreeing with the intellectual dishonesty of pretending that a behavior CHOICE which is an adaptation that works for some is a natural state of being, like gender, or skin, or eye color. I call “B.S.!” on that.

Precisely because I believe it requires an Anarcho-Christian culture to support and sustain the type of constitutionally limited government given to us by America’s Founders in the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, I disagree with those who, out of ignorance of the spiritual mechanics of the universe, seek to impose by coercion/force/violence of human law their “religious” beliefs on others who may not share those beliefs, especially when I believe those behaviors, however disgusting, and however condemned in the books of Leviticus and Romans, do not so obviously harm other individuals as murder, rape, theft and false testimony do.
In the system of God’s law, Jesus said to love the sinner but hate the sin. In the system of man’s law, generally speaking, sincerely held religious beliefs cannot be constitutionally extrapolated into contempt of court as they are beyond the reach of government. United States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78 (1944).
There is nothing in either system of law that prevents me from saying what vile and reprobate minds it takes to, as a matter of propaganda strategy, pretend that those whose religion teaches that homosexuality is sin are “haters”, “racists”, “bigots” and/or “homophobes”. It takes an evil, vile and reprobate mind to try to control the thoughts and speech of others through the obvious intellectual and unconstitutional fraud of “hate speech” and “hate crimes”.
It takes a evil, vile and reprobate mind to try to use barbaric beheader imperialistic Islam to try to destroy the core principles of Golden Rule Christianity just to circumvent the biblical moral prohibitions against self-perceived-as-clever individuals from stealing the labor of their less clever neighbors via such criminal devices as interest-bearing debt-as-money fiat currency which are “none the less a robbery because it is done under the forms of law and is called taxation.” Citizens’ Savings & Loan Ass’n v. City of Topeka, 87 U.S. 655 (1874).

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Subscribe to print edition
Sign in to your account

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy