Immigration laws and domestic violence

The latest verbal warfare between Garfield County Sheriff Lou Vallario and the American Civil Liberties Union — marked with all the sublety of a WWF wrestling match promotion —  makes for great news stories. But it also highlights a problem regarding the treatment of suspected illegal immigrants in this state and this country:

Should such people be deported — or face the threat of deportation — simply because they are the victims of domestic violence?

Colorado’s 6-year-old immigration law requires police who arrest someone on most charges to report that person to Immigration and Customs Enforcement if they believe the person is in this country illegally.

But that law exempts people arrested in domestic violence cases from being reported until they are convicted. That’s because both victim and perpetrator are frequently arrested in domestic violence cases, since it’s often hard to determine initially who the victim is.

At least, that’s the ACLU’s interpretation of the law. Sheriff Vallario has a different view.

Vallario was criticized by the ACLU and the Colorado Immigration Rights Coalition this week for reporting domestic violence arrestees to ICE as soon as they are jailed, rather than waiting until there is a conviction.

Vallario maintains the law doesn’t prohibit him from reporting those arrests to ICE and said he would be violating other parts of Colorado law if he didn’t turn over that information to federal immigration authorities.

Legal experts say there’s enough wiggle room in the Colorado law to give some credence to both Vallario’s and the ACLU’s arguments.

But those arguments may now be moot, since a new federal program known as Secure Communities officially took effect in Colorado this week.

It requires that the fingerprints of any suspect jailed in any county in Colorado be forwarded to ICE through the FBI. Then ICE is to check for illegals convicted of violent crimes.

It’s a sensible program on its face, aimed at dealing quickly with those who are not only here illegally, but have also committed violent crimes.

But it makes no exemption for those who may be jailed even though they are victims of domestic violence, although ICE authorities say they don’t intend to deport such victims.

However, like Vallario’s interpretation of a state law, it leaves victimized immigrant women (and some men) with a horrible choice: Should they report beatings or worse they receive at the hands of a spouse or boyfriend and risk deportation, or should they suffer in silence?

ICE should find a way to exempt domestic violence cases from the fingerprint reporting so that domestic violence victims aren’t faced with making such a desperate calculation.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

Thank you for your common sense approach to protecting women and children from domestic abuse. Sure we want our immigration laws to be enforced, but we don’t want to see women beaten to death by abusers because they can’t decide which is worse—a beating or deportation.

What am I missing here?  If people are here illegally and not seeking to become citizens, but are involved in crimes, domestic or otherwise, the process of deportation should not apply in case they are a victim?

Any moron involved in domestic abuse should be arrested, if convicted, serve the time necessary for supposed rehabilitation, and if not a U.S. citizen should be sent out of the country on the next available transportation!

Victims should be treated, directed through the steps of citizenship, which if not followed, they too should be sent out of the country on the next available transportation.  Become a citizen or take your problems to your own country!

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
Advertiser Tearsheet

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy