Agencies’ roles may affect fines in Parachute leak

Parachute_Natural_gas_plant

State agencies continue to discuss issues of jurisdictional oversight over the liquid hydrocarbons leak near Parachute, something that could have a bearing in terms of the amount of potential…




COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


I found an interesting tidbit about the Parachute spill yesterday—OSHA got involved after a reporter asked OSHA if they were involved. CDPHE didn’t seem to be concerned about the health of the clean-up crew, but thanks to a reporter in Glenwood, they are now. Thank you, Dennis Webb, for digging into possible fines. Now let’s pressure CDPHE to do their job, which is protecting the health of both citizens and the environment.

The biggest cost comes from fixing the problem?  So, that doesn’t obviate the need for a meaningful fine.  Let’s review.  Leak (maybe) started around Dec.  Williams discovers in January but mistakes 10,000 gallons of spill for less than 42.  In March it gets reported again…

Incidents such as Parachute Creek and the Rifle leak are exactly why citizens of the North Fork Valley fought so hard and will continue to fight to prevent gas drilling and fracking around Hotchkiss, Crawford and Paonia.  We don’t want or need similar incidents polluting our organically centered valley.

Page 1 of 1






Search More Jobs






THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy