Board member: Teachers’ jobs solid

A District 51 School Board member says teachers should not fear that the Nov. 5 election will result in pink slips for them, regardless of who wins.

Board member Jeff Leany said during board open comment at a meeting last week that two teachers called him and said they were afraid for their jobs after attending two meetings recently at Rim Rock Elementary. Leany said the teachers told him a member of teacher representation group Mesa Valley Education Association told them all teachers would be fired, then hired back at a lower pay rate and the association’s agreement with the school district would be thrown out if the three Republican-endorsed candidates in the upcoming school board election were elected.

Those candidates are Pat Kanda in District C, who is running against newly appointed board member John Williams and Lonnie White; Mike Lowenstein in District D, who is facing Tom Parrish; and John Sluder in District E, who is up against Board President Greg Mikolai.

Leany asked Superintendent Steve Schultz and association President Darren Cook to verify at the Sept. 17 school board meeting that the association’s contract with the district is binding for the next three years, although terms are negotiated annually. Leany said afterward that comments about plans to fire teachers if Kanda, Lowenstein and Sluder joined Leany and Ann Tisue on the board are lies.

“It’s absolutely ludicrous. It’s fear tactics to get people to vote the way the union wants,” Leany said.

Cook said he had not heard about the comments until Sept. 17. He said he has yet to determine if anything inaccurate was stated, but comments about contract dismissal do not reflect association views.

“There are 900 (association) teachers, and we don’t speak with one voice,” Cook said.

Cook said the person who may have made those comments could have been referring to the possibility of District 51 seeking to emulate Falcon School District 49.

Falcon 49, northeast of Colorado Springs, implemented zones of innovation last school year, eliminating four administrative roles, replacing the superintendent with a chief executive officer and splitting schools into zones that have autonomy to ask for waivers to change teacher employment and salary conditions.

Leany said some board members have looked at Falcon 49’s changes but there has been “no serious talk about schools or zones of innovation.” Leany said Falcon is just one district he has researched.

“We can’t continue to do the same things we’re doing,” Leany said. “Douglas County is 15 points ahead of us (on Transitional Colorado Assessment Program scores). Why wouldn’t we want to emulate that?”

Kanda, Sluder and Lowenstein said they are interested in changing local education but haven’t settled on a method for doing so. Sluder said he would want input from teachers and staff before adopting anything like a zone of innovation system, and Kanda said innovation doesn’t necessarily mean adopting new methods.

“We need to be innovative in the way we look at trying to improve education, but I’m old school. Let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water,” Kanda said.

All three said firing teachers is not a priority in their platforms.

“The union has a contract and we can’t just willy-nilly start firing people. It’s a scare tactic,” Lowenstein said.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

No indeed. Tisue and Leany are hell bent on privatizing schools. When Tisue ran I wondered why, when her own silver spoon kids were home schooled, she wanted to run for the school board. Then it hit me. She wanted to prove to the republicans that she COULD be elected to something. Anything. A stepping stone to bigger and more “powerful” offices(s). And atop all of it the Republican party says “more money will be spent on a school board election than any in history.” I will NOT vote for any mentioned here. The republicans can *.

District 51 would jump at the chance to emulate Douglas county schools where funding is about triple what Mesa county gets. There are added administrators and specific additions to core area academics.  It would be very unsettling to professional educators to go the route of CEO business leaders to lead schools.

Of course, some believe that mediocre business people are experts in leading schools and anyone off the streets can step into a classroom and teach!  For the funding MVSD 51 receives they should get medals of honor rather than looking for other things to pursue.  How about pushing funding to begin with and then let professional educators lead?

Why only cite Kanda, Sluder, and Lowenstein and only quote Kanda when there are seven candidates running?  Does this reporter have an agenda?  If so, she should be taken off this beat immediately.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy