‘Compromise’ shouldn’t 
be dirty word in politics

We’re not great fans of either Senate President Harry Reid or Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. Both are often guilty of needless brinksmanship, overheated rhetoric and pandering to the fringes of their parties.

But, with the government partially shut down and federal default looming, the two old Senate lions did what elected officials are supposed to do in our representative form of government. They met repeatedly to hammer out an agreement to end the shutdown and prevent government default.

They each gave up something in that agreement, although McConnell conceded more because, thanks to some uncompromising and unrealistic members of his party, he had started from a position that just about everyone knew was untenable.

Under the compromise, Obamacare was left almost entirely intact, but Democrats accepted continued government spending at the sequestration levels implemented early this year. The government will be funded through Jan. 15, and the debt ceiling will be raised to meet our obligations through Feb. 7. Also, a bipartisan budget committee will be formed to attempt to avoid a future impasse.

As this was written Wednesday afternoon, it was unclear whether the compromise crafted by Reid and McConnell would win approval in the House, where some of the most uncompromising members of Congress reside. However, since their champion in the Senate, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, agreed not to delay the measure in that chamber, there was hope that the House tea party caucus would let it pass, or would be outvoted by Democrats and the more sensible Republicans.

Observers expected passage of the compromise. If not, the United States could start defaulting on debt payments today. That wouldn’t cause the economy to crash immediately, but it would put us on a path toward that catastrophe.

This country has the largest economy in the world, but if people can’t trust our government to pay its bills, they will become less and less eager to buy U.S. Treasury bonds. That would lead to ballooning interest rates in this country, not just for the government, but in the private sector. And that, in turn, would be a significant drag on the already slow economy.

No, it wouldn’t happen overnight. But even a one-time default — which has never occurred in U.S. history — could substantially damage our reputation. As billionaire Warren Buffet put it Wednesday, “Creditworthiness is like virginity. It can be preserved, but not restored very easily.”

The fact that U.S. creditworthiness will apparently be preserved, at least for the time being, is thanks to two longtime political opponents in the Senate who understand that their job is not to remain ideologically pure on all matters, or to work only with people who share their beliefs, but to negotiate measures to operate our government based on interaction with people who hold different views and have different goals.

Next time you go to the polls for any election, look for candidates who understand that fact about how our representative democracy works.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

RE your last paragraph:  Scott Tipton would not be one of those candidates.  Time for the Sentinel to call for his resignation.

Kudos to the Sentinel for editorially rejecting (“’Compromise’ shouldn’t be dirty word in politics”) the central tenet of the “Tea Party’s” perversion of “conservative principles”.

Despite paying obligatory lip-service to the false equivalency between the purported “brinkmanship” of Senators Harry Reid (D-Nev) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky), the Sentinel (and Reid) aptly noted that – in crafting the bill ending the “government shutdown” (until January 15, 2014) and avoiding “debt limit” default (until February 13, 2014) passed late last night – McConnell faced-down “uncompromising and unrealistic members of his party” (which heretofore included Congressman Scott Tipton), whose irresponsible antics wasted at least $24 billion.

For his troubles, McConnell obtained $3 billion for his home state – funding an Army Corps of Engineers navigability project on the lower Ohio River.

Similarly, Colorado’s Democratic Senators Bennet and Udall – diligently working behind-the-scenes—garnered $450 million “earmarked” for Colorado flood relief, along with $636 million for nationwide wildland fire suppression activities. 

Local veterans should be pleased that the bill also authorized an additional $294 million to continue reducing the backlog of benefit claims at the VA.

As the AP reports (“Congress narrowly avoids default”), Representative Hal Rogers (R-Ky), House Appropriations Committee Chairman (and the only GOP House member to speak in favor of the bill), emerged as the lone Republican voice of sanity.  Contrary to his Republican colleagues, Rogers (like Democrats) insists that current “sequestration” spending levels are far below what are actually needed to run the government. 
The lengthiest – and procedurally most significant – section of the bill is appropriately titled the “Default Prevention Act of 2013”, which codifies McConnell’s 2011 proposal to avoid the next “debt ceiling” crisis by authorizing (until February 7, 2014) President Obama to unilaterally “suspend” (raise) the debt ceiling, subject to Congressional acquiescence or rejection.
Tipton – perhaps responding to growing calls for his resignation—voted “AYE”.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
Advertiser Tearsheet

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy