Fracking regs could cost billions, industry claims

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*

Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

This industry takes billions of dollars of oil and gas out of land owned by the public, pays a minimal royalty for doing so, makes more profit than any other industry on the planet, and doesn’t want to play by rules that are designed to keep our water and air clean and our livestock, wildlife, and citizens healthy? This isn’t going to break them, but a health problem for a worker could very well destroy the family of the worker. It is time to get our priorities straight. Stop putting profits over people.

Add $1 a gallon to your next tank of gas, and prepare for your next xcel rate hike, brought to you by the eco-hypocrits of america. Energy companies aren’t just going to absorb these costs, they will pass them on down to consumers.

M Todd Miskel, you have been drinking the kool-aid too long. The federal regulations are looking a lot like the regulatins that already exist in Colorado, and that industry has accepted as valid and good, per a story written by this reporter just this week. Doing what they are already doing, is not going to increase expenses. Then there is the little fact that you are ignoring about taxpayers paying for clean up from extractive industries. That doesn’t hit you in your pocket? Let’s prevent the pollution instead of digging into our pockets to clean it up.

James, it is scientific fact that some of the chemicals used in fracking are toxic to humans and wildlife. It is scientific fact that the industry has developed some green fracking fluids that are sourced from the food industry. It is scientific fact that industry does not widely use the green fracking fluids because they are more expensive. It is scientific fact that there have been multiple spills related to the life cycle of wells, many of which have polluted rivers—the most recent just last week in Canada. It is scientific fact that industry has not been required to establish any baseline for water, air, or soil quality before beginning operations, giving them plausible deniability for any pollution that has occurred. This is a strategy that provides them cover for any liability, as demonstrated in a court case that was resolved to the satisfaction of industry just last week. Plausible deniability is speculation on my part about the strategy of the industry. The rest is scientific fact. P.S. Google Pavillion, Wyoming.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Subscribe to print edition
Sign in to your account

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy