Health exchange repeal fails

DENVER — The GOP legislator who helped establish Colorado’s part of Obamacare defended the state’s health care exchange Tuesday.

Rep. Amy Stephens told fellow Colorado Springs Republican Rep. Janak Joshi that his bill to repeal the law that created the Connect for Health Colorado health care exchange is the wrong approach unless he can propose some workable alternative.

The exchange, the state’s response to the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Healthcare Act, has been slow out of the gate in signing up enrollees.

Still, it’s the best thing the state has to offer, Stephens told Joshi.

“To come here and say repeal without any other kind of strategy for this state, any other health care ideas, just in my mind is indefensible,” she said. “I say that to you and I say it to the rest of my colleagues, you come to this committee, you want to repeal something, you better have an idea in place because the market demands it.”

Stephens was the lead House sponsor, and the only Republican, behind a 2011 law that created the exchange in Colorado.

As a result, some members of her own party dubbed the new law, “Amycare,” even though the concept was first raised by Republican Gov. Bill Owens long before she was elected to the Colorado Legislature.

It was no surprise then when the House Public Health Care & Human Services Committee killed the bill on an 8-5 vote, with Stephens joining the seven Democrats on the 13-member panel opposing it.

In arguing for the bill, Joshi said the state should cut its losses on the exchange, saying not enough people have signed up for it, and that it’s been more expensive for enrollees than originally thought.

“These are the people who couldn’t afford it in the first place, so I wonder if they will be able to afford to see the doctors even though they have insurance,” he told the committee, referring to high deductibles and co-payments that are coming with the coverage. “It’s like you buy a car, but the gasoline is so expensive that you can’t even use the car.”

He said the Legislature may not have been told exactly what the exchange was or how it would operate, saying some of the testimony that helped get the law enacted was “not told truthfully.”

That raised the ire of Stephens, who said the state’s exchange has passed several audits about how it is operating.

“The public and our Legislature was told absolutely everything up front about this (exchange law),” she said. “We’ve had legislative oversight review of this going on steadily from the moment the bill was passed. If anyone wants to insinuate that anything less than honest, or anything less than transparent, has been going on here, I really take offense to it and the record won’t support that.”


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

It has always been my understanding that Medicaid filled the gap for the uninsured. So why do we need the ACA? This act has increased costs for insurance, limited medical access for the elderly, forced the poor to meet a unaffordable deductible, reduced the work force to part time, etc. The ACA is an albatross on the American people to extract more money from the public. According to Saul Alinsky, an Obama mentor, to control healthcare is to control the populous within a Socialist State. S. Price

Good for Amy Stephens!  Something had to be done. ACA may not be the answer but until all the whine bags can come up with a better alternative it is put up or shut up time. Medical costs are out of control and insurance companies are gouging the public.

I agree that something must be done about medical costs in
America. However, ACA is not about Healthcare, it is about controlling the citizens of our country. Healthcare does not take 2800 pages to correct, it takes doctor’s liability, prescription drugs, Tort reform and Patients cooperation to reduce costs. The government cannot mandate that all the people involved will commit to reduce medical costs. It must be a cooperative effort to provide the best service at the best cost. In other words an all state inclusive free market situation. Government has never improved on Market Competition. Rusty Price

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy