Piceance oil, gas plan raises lease rights concerns

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*


Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

The companies argue that conditions should not be imposed at the time of lease, because at that point, number of wells, etc. is not known - and that conditions should wait for drilling permits. They want to have it both ways.

In the North Fork, the CO BLM is arguing that everything will be fine leasing lands under a 30-year-old NEPA analysis because it can attached updated ‘conditions of approval’ to address these very same issues (and a host of others never considered in its base-line RMP from the 1980s).  Here we see that that is likely not the case, and the attempt to pretend such protections will apply is a shell game.  This article demonstrates why protections need to be in the land use plan, and when that land use plan is decades and decades outdated, then a new land use plan needs to be in place BEFORE leasing.



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy