Secret ballot decision could impact Mesa County elections

Mesa County Clerk Shelia Reiner should inform county voters of the implications of Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s recent election rule change forbidding printing ballots with bar codes that can be linked to individual voters.

Although the ruling applies to 44 counties that use preprinted bar codes to identify ballots — a practice not used in Mesa County — the principle of ballot secrecy should apply to all voting procedures.

Reiner has demonstrated that the batching of ballots conducted by her office makes it possible to link individual voters to their ballots. Though her method is different, the result is the same as with bar-coded ballots: It is possible to link voters to ballots in county elections.

Gessler’s rule change results from the two-year battle by Marilyn Marks and Citizen Center to assure transparency in Colorado elections, including the right of citizens to review voted ballots to confirm election results.

County clerks, including Reiner, have used their ability to identify individual voters by their ballots as a reason to deny citizens access to voted ballots immediately after an election.

According to Citizen Center, Gessler and some clerks took the position that Colorado voters have no constitutional right to a secret ballot. Election officials, they said, are not prohibited from knowing how individuals vote in elections.

Citizen Center sued Gessler and selected county clerks “to vindicate Colorado voters’ constitutional rights to a secret ballot.” It alleged that, “In recent years many Colorado election officials have used computerized voting systems and record-keeping to compromise the voters’ right to maintain private ballot choices and keep them secret from the prying eyes of government.”

Last June, the Colorado Supreme Court refused to reconsider an appellant court decision affirming the right to a secret ballot and the right of citizens to review election results.

“This is a welcome decision that reconfirms the vitality of the Colorado Open Records Act as a powerful tool that permits ordinary Coloradans to hold their state and local governments accountable,” said Marks’ attorney, Robert A. McGuire of Denver.

Marks added, “Colorado election officials have fought transparency, despite numerous pro-transparency court rulings and Secretary of State Gessler’s guidance that anonymous, untraceable ballots are open public records. Voters’ ballots must be untraceable, voted in private and counted in public, as the courts continue to affirm.”

Though Gessler had earlier supported the clerks’ position, when he was presented with evidence that votes could be identified by bar codes, he moved quickly to end the practice before the November election.

He has now adopted an emergency rule to prevent counties from printing ballots with unique numbers and barcodes, his office said.

Citizen Center filed in federal court for a temporary restraining order to prevent the use of traceable ballots in November. That case was resolved, but the rule Gessler put in place is only temporary. After the election, a permanent rule to protect voter identity, and ensure citizen accesses to voted ballots will need to be enacted.

The implications for the state from this ruling are enormous. As McGuire explained, “The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled in no uncertain terms that an election in which all ballots are traceable back to their voters is a void election. No wiggle room, no exceptions. That means every race on the ballot this November, from dog catcher all the way up to president, will be in jeopardy of being thrown out if this illegal practice of printing unique, traceable numbers and barcodes on Colorado ballots isn’t stopped.”

A Grand Junction man, Bill Hugenberg, commented on a story at GJSentinel.com, “Fortunately, Mesa County Clerk and Recorder Sheila Reiner is not immediately affected by Gessler’s emergency rule, because she does not allow traceable bar codes on ballots. However, because traceable barcodes are now prohibited by rule, then Reiner’s local discretionary ‘batching’ procedures ... are similarly suspect.”

This ambiguity could leave Mesa County voters uncertain of the legitimacy of the votes they will cast in November. Could we precipitate a head-on constitutional collision that could have national consequences? Mesa County voters deserve an answer to that question.

Bill Grant lives in Grand Junction. He can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


While local Republicans may be reveling in the anti-Obama rhetoric spewing from their brethren in Tampa, Bill Grant’s column – “Decisions on ballot secrecy could affect election in Mesa County (August 29, 2012) – should serve as a “wake-up call”.

As a result of Republican Secretary of State Scott Gessler’s emergency ruling on August 21, 2012 – prohibiting traceable barcodes on paper ballots – Mesa County Republicans could be entirely disenfranchised by the actions of our Republican County Clerk and Recorder Sheila Reiner.

While Reiner does not use traceable barcodes, she employs local “batching” procedures which achieve the same result – linking voted ballots to the identity of the voter – by systematically ordering ballots within batches rather than randomizing them (as is routinely done elsewhere in Colorado and across the country).

Moreover, rather than simply adopt cost-free remedial procedures, Reiner is instead expending thousands of taxpayers’ dollars and the County Attorney’s valuable time to argue in federal court that we Americans have “no fundamental constitutional right” to vote by secret ballot and that, even if we have such a right, it does not preclude sworn election officials (i.e., the government) from being able to ascertain how we voted.

Meanwhile, none of the cases involving Reiner has been resolved – despite rulings in related cases indicating that further litigation will be fruitless.  Moreover, Reiner should expect to be sued again shortly – seeking a TRO to stop her unconstitutional practices.

Colorado’s impending election debacle is entirely attributable to the Republican-controlled Colorado County Clerks Association, which sought to exempt voted paper ballots from the Colorado Open Records Act by proving that ballots were traceable—apparently not realizing that traceability is unconstitutional.
As Gessler told a public hearing on July 23, 2012, “There is no consistency whatsoever.  Frankly, there is some scary stuff being done by county clerks” – including Reiner.
              Bill Hugenberg
              543 Rim Drive
              Grand Junction, CO 81507
                    257-1998

The County Clerk should know who voted, but not how they voted.

Tim:

You got it!  That’s the common sense solution that Reiner is spending our tax dollars to oppose—on behalf of the Colorado County Clerks Association.

Bill H.

I understand that mail-in ballots are counted and tallied each day during the mail-in season. Ballots should not be counted until after the polls have closed on election day.

Bill, since you and I are the only ones who are commenting, it seems the rest of the voting pubic doesn’t care about fair elections.

Tim:

Election officials would rather process early voting mail-in ballots as they come in—even though tabulated vote count cannot be accessed until polls close on Election Day—to expedite release of results (speed over accuracy).

Most Americans just assume that we have “the best election system in the world” and pay little attention to the integrity of our elections—because most elections are not close enough to be affected by “registration fraud”, “voter fraud”, or election fraud by sworn but partisan election officials.

Local Republicans do not want to admit that one of their own—who is angling for leadership of the Colorado Clerks Association—is both compromising ballot secrecy and spending taxpayers’ money to defend the indefensible.

Local Democrats do not want to raise a ruckus that would lend more credence to already widespread anecdotal “evidence” of voter intimidation by Republican-leaning employers in Mesa County.

Only if more citizens like you take an interest—and Marilyn Marks in Aspen—take an interest can we make a difference.  See Citizen Center website.

Meanwhile, a simple lawsuit could void all election results from Mesa County this November.

Page 1 of 1




TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy