Taking on water

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*


Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

While it remains locally fashionable for disingenuous politicians to suggest that “The West is under assault” by the federal government (Gary Harmon, “Taking on water”), Congressman Scott Tipton’s proposed legislation may be a superfluous stunt – because Western water has long been subject to state water law under the McCarran Amendment (1952) and Colorado River Water District v. United States (1976).

What’s missing from Tipton’s claim (and Harmon’s reporting) is that the Forest Service is pursuing a long-standing policy requiring “that ski areas surrender water rights to the U.S. Forest Service as a condition of obtaining their permits to operate on lands administered by the Forest Service”.

Since 1983 – during President Ronald Reagan’s administration—Forest Service permits have required ski areas to title water rights used for snow-making in the name of the United States.  Doing so ensures that those water rights “run with the land” and cannot be readily transferred for other uses – to the potential detriment of successor ski operators, local communities dependent on ski operations, graziers, and/or the national forest itself.

For the next twenty years, that policy was inconsistently enforced (but not necessarily legally “waived”), such that many Colorado ski areas obtained water rights without so titling them.  In 2004, the Bush Administration’s Forest Service began requiring joint ownership of such water rights with the U.S., while dubiously “grandfathering” previous non-compliant permits.  In 2011, President Obama’s Forest Service sought to restore consistency to the policy by requiring compliance as a condition for permit renewal.

In December 2012, a federal court – without ruling on the renewal conditions – ordered the Forest Service to withdraw its directive, pending completion of the public process required by the Administrative Procedures Act.  That process is now under way, and may well result in re-ratification of the Forest Service’s prudent 30 year-old policy.

I wonder if Tipton has met Chris Treese?



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy