Tipton, Bennet mixed on Obama’s selection for security adviser

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*

Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

While Congressman Scott Tipton deserves credit for focusing on the truly scandalous backlog at the VA (“Tipton wants bill to cut backlog at Veterans Affairs”, June 6, 2013), his continued support for the partisan “witch hunt” arising from the fake Benghazi “scandal” (“Obama names Rice as national security adviser; Tipton, Bennet mixed on Obama’s selection”, June 6, 2013) remains reprehensible.

Hopefully, the diversion of “$10 million from conference spending toward efforts to cut the case backlog” will have the desired effect on the backlog without compromising employee training.  Unfortunately, bureaucracies operating in a “use it or lose it” budgetary environment too often find ways to pad expenses in order to avoid cutbacks.  In 2010, the Census Bureau spent some $1 million saved by understaffing Census2010 in Western Colorado on a lavish get-together in Las Vegas.

Meanwhile, contrary to Tipton’s disingenuous statement, the appointment of former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice as President Obama’s chosen national security adviser no more “circumvents any oversight” than did President Bush’s appointment of Condoleezza Rice to that position – and/or his father’s appointment of Colin Powell thereto.  Indeed, the position was established by Republican President Dwight Eisenhower in 1953 to provide independent and consolidated counsel to the President on national security matters and therefore embodies the doctrine of “separation of powers” imbedded in our Constitution.

Similarly, Tipton resorts to familiar partisan bullshit by falsely asserting that Rice was “at the forefront of misrepresenting” the Benghazi attacks.  As Tipton surely knows from Darrell Issa’s hearings, there were no such “misrepresentations”.  Rather, Rice relied on “talking points” developed and provided by our intelligence community – all twelve iterations of which perhaps incorrectly opined that the attack arose “spontaneously”, because a national security directive prohibited speculation as to responsible parties in order to avoid compromising and/or complicating the anticipated FBI investigation.

The 3d CD deserves better from Tipton.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Subscribe to print edition
Sign in to your account

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy