Voters face major election choice 
when it comes to fixing Medicare

To Continue Reading, Please Log In


Forgot your password?

7-day subscribers of The Daily Sentinel have unlimited access to all digital content with their log-in. Guests must register for limited access -- 12 articles a month.

Already a 7-day subscriber? Start here to activate your online access.
Don't have a username and password? Register now

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Four items in Sunday’s Sentinel – AP’s reports that “Ryan misstated claim of running 3 hour marathon” and “Matthews plays over-the-top hardball with Republicans”,  Kathleen Parker’s “Romney offered a clearer picture of who he is in Thursday speech”, and Michael Pramenko’s “Voters face major election choice when it comes to fixing Medicare” – offer “food for thought”.

Ryan lied about his marathon time (by over an hour) in a nationally televised interview.

The “clearer picture” offered by Romney omitted any reference to “RomneyCare” – nor corrected the record regarding Romney-Ryan’s falsehoods about the Affordable Care Act, the Simpson-Bowles Commission, and/or the bogus $700 billion “cut” to Medicare.

No wonder Chris Matthews is incensed by Republicans’ persistent resort to overt racism to evade the “garbage” being peddled as “policy” by Romney-Ryan and Reince Priebus.

Fortunately, our own Dr. Pramenko offers a clinically “clear picture”.  Who should you trust?, he asks—those who would “fix” Medicare ten years from now by converting it from a defined benefit guarantee to an uncertain “voucher” program, or those who have already extended Medicare’s (as we know it now) viability by eight years?; those who falsely accuse President Obama of “cutting” future Medicare benefits by $716 billion while using that same “savings” to fund more tax cuts for the wealthy, or those who are already redeploying those savings to expand preventive care for the elderly and women?

“In addition, the Romney-Ryan plan will rely on private insurers to bend the cost curve”, but these are the same “private insurers” responsible for rising premiums, “pre-existing conditions”, benefit caps, arbitrary coverage cancellations, and profit-driven medical “death panels” in the first place!

Meanwhile, both President Obama and Club 20 endorse our local approach as an example of how competition from not-for-profit insurers in a statewide “insurance cooperative” can foster vital competition.

              Bill Hugenberg                   543 Rim Drive, GJ 81507
              257-1998
              .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy