The nice thing about free speech is how it tends to allow speakers to parade their all-consuming ignorance with all the self-consciousness of a streaker at a rugby game.
Something on that level happened last week when a genius decided to exercise his freedom of expression and deface a sign, put up by the Freedom from Religion Foundation, that urged passersby to keep religion out of government.
The budding spray-paint artiste covered over the word “religion” on the billboard with another word of four letters, that number presumably chosen to reflect the square of the artiste’s IQ.
Since it’s unlikely there’s a groundswell in the Grand Valley against the cancer sticks smoked by Cockney nicotine fiends, it’s probable that the four-letter word referred to men who are sexually attracted to the same sex.
It might be nice to see some variant of handwriting analysis used to identify the miscreant, but the fact is that he (or, possibly but not very likely, she) rendered the artwork in question while in a hallucinogenic- or alcohol-induced haze.
For the record, that’s pure speculation.
But that’s the nice thing about this free- speech thing: It virtually guarantees that the droning menaces who shuffle unnoticed among us eventually will cast off the camouflage of everyday, relatively quiet stupidity and gloriously self identify in a gauche burst of spray paint.
Such is the case here.
It’s worth noting that a previous column I wrote on the subject of that very billboard took issue with the whole idea of keeping religion out of government. That column elicited a response from the usual suspects eager to demonstrate a pronounced, even practiced, ability to miss the point.
Still, the exchange was civil and steered well clear of vandalism.
Passing over without comment the possibility that a reversal of circumstances could very well garner a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts and sackloads of fawning publicity, we should consider what exactly ought to happen now.
Sadly, much of the point that the billboard made was underscored by the specimen of homo moronicus who tarnished it. To be sure, there are those who would cloak prejudice in religious garments and call it God’s work.
There also are those who would muzzle dissent by calling it hate speech.
In this case, the former seems to be at play.
Call it a social contract if you like, but there’s something of an unspoken agreement implicit in the freedom of speech.
The atheists paid for a billboard. Had they chosen to do so with cash, the bills would bear the words “In God We Trust.”
In any case, they purchased a property right that was violated, ostensibly in the name of the people who disagree with them.
At least it’s easy for the atheists to blame the opposition.
Appearances might be mere veneer, but they do count for something.
One can’t very well claim to support free speech, private property and all that and fail to condemn those who would violate either.
Spray painting the billboard amounts to theft.
Condemnation, of course, is cheap.
Anyone with a spray can, the cover of darkness and a shot of courage can manage that, as homo moronicus has indelibly demonstrated.
If you want to stand up for free speech, property rights and the stuff at issue, send a few bucks to the Freedom from Religion Foundation, P.O. Box 750, Madison, Wisc., 53701. Enclose a note saying that it’s intended as recompense for the work of some halfwit in Grand Junction stealing their sign.
They’ll be shocked. Really.
Comments
By Tom Thiessen
Nov 8, 2009 8:22 PM | Link to this
Yes, stealing is wrong. But I wonder why the atheists would think it to be so. I wonder if they saw the act of vandalism as an expression of the survival of the fittest, and applauded it. Sure, the culprit was breaking the law, but in the atheist's worldview, why keep the law? If you can get away with your expression of power and exerting your views on others, why not? I can tell you why I would not do it: because I am a Christian. I recognize and (strive to) submit to God's revealed standards for morality. Stealing is wrong because God says it is wrong. But if there is no God, then you can have no consistent standard higher than your personal preference for morality. If the guy with the spray paint can was expressing his personal preference, then who are the atheists to tell him he was wrong? It seems to put the atheists in a bit of a pickle. Of course generally, the atheists are fairly nominal in their faith in atheism, and end up borrowing Christian standards to make moral judgments. I don't blame them, I wouldn't want to live consistently with my views if I were and atheist either.
By Joe Duba
Nov 2, 2009 2:31 PM | Link to this
Summer Rain:
You are in error about the fathers founding this nation upon Christian beliefs - yes, they did believe in God, but most of them were deists. Deism is not Christianity. Our founding fathers were products of the enlightenment, and as such, they saw the horrifying effects of governments with close ties to religion. This prison based on Christian principles is only the latest in a string of horrors perpetuated by those who believe in a theocratic form of government.
I challenge you to read the Constitution or any other founding document of the United States and quote for me any Biblical context. You will find none. The Constitution is one of the most secular documents I have ever read. I suggest you try reading it again.
I am constantly amazed that the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.
By Lori Parrott
Nov 2, 2009 9:03 AM | Link to this
Maybe you could also have money sent to Mesa County Right to Life for the billboard defaced on North and 5th about 2 years ago. Red paint splattered all over it to appear like blood. We had to replace it and I don't remember any concerns from the paper about the damage. Or does this not meet your defacing, halfwit, theft, hate speech requirements?
By Summer Rain
Nov 1, 2009 11:36 AM | Link to this
Your article was very well-written. Vandalism and "tagging" is always a menance and ridiculous. It sounds like something some unsupervised teen rebel did. Yes, they stole from the atheists that paid for this billboard to express their opinions and their message.
Asking people to donate money to the Freedom from Religion Foundation is a little overboard though, in my opinion. And you correctly pointed out that our currency does have "In God We Trust" written on it (for now). Our founding fathers did trust in God and they did found this country upon Christian beliefs, like it or not. And just because 200+ years later some people get too educated and intellectual to believe in God, doesn't mean much to me, personally.
Let them bear the cost of the damages like churches do when they get vandalized. At the Freedom from Religion Foundation's next meeting, they can pass around an offering plate.
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F, except on Tuesday when it's open until 9 p.m.
Post a comment
*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.