A lizard weighs in on the park debate

To Continue Reading, Please Log In


Forgot your password?

7-day subscribers of The Daily Sentinel have unlimited access to all digital content with their log-in. Guests must register for limited access -- 12 articles a month.

Already a 7-day subscriber? Start here to activate your online access.
Don't have a username and password? Register now

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Hey little collard lizard fellow, you are a wise reptile indeed. Proponents of a national park base their position on “prestige” and “exponential” growth in tourism. I’m sure the last things you and your wild neighbors on the Colorado National Monument need are a false sense of “importance” and burgeoning numbers of feet trampling your habitat. You’re neutral on the topic of redesignation, which in the long-term vision of geological time is but the blink of an eye. But in the short-term, which could be 50, 100, 200 years into the future, national park status, and the “exponential” growth proponents claim will come with it, your little world, your habitat, your diet of insects and the occasional prickly pear fruit, could be trampled and destroyed; gone for generations. After your morning sunning on that outcrop of Wingate sanstone, take a minute and read what happens in heavily traveled national parks. http://rewilding.org/rewildit/images/NPS-Road-Fatalities-Survey.pdf

Great article!  Refreshing perspective of a complicated issue…thanks!



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy