Citizen groups to present budget findings

The District 51 School Board will hear ideas from two community groups Tuesday about trimming next year’s budget.

The board has to cut between $2 million and $4 million from the district’s 2012–13 budget to compensate for an anticipated decline in enrollment, required increases in district contributions to employee retirement accounts, and a gap in project funding. Members of the Budget Oversight Committee and Save Our Students will present suggestions for cuts at a 6 p.m. board meeting Tuesday at the Basil T. Knight Center.

The oversight committee consists of 19 community members selected by the School Board to offer an outside viewpoint on budget cuts. Committee Chairman Joe Skinner said the committee will present three lists of potential budget reductions, labeled “strongly preferred,” “preferred” and “marginal.” “Strongly preferred” suggestions earned at least 70 percent support when committee members voted on them; “preferred” suggestions had 50 to 69 percent support; and the “marginal” options got support from a majority of people who voted on them, but some people abstained from the vote.

The “strongly preferred” list, although subject to change before Tuesday’s meeting, includes cuts to administration and increasing class sizes by one student. Slightly less popular items include dipping into reserve funds or charging fees for busing.

The citizen-created group Save Our Students, which consists mostly of parents and has a central, eight-person board, independently researched the district’s budget, spoke with staff, and came up with its own list of budget reductions.

Save Our Students Board member Rob Pierce said the group decided the district can go one of two ways.

It can make incremental cuts that would impact employees across the district. Or, it can place more of the budget burden on the community by charging fees for busing, charging more for sports and activities, increasing busing boundaries at some middle and high schools, and making some cuts to administration.

Pierce said the second option may be hard on parents, but he believes the first option would mean busier district employees, which could impact student learning.

He added the group hopes the School Board will embrace their opinion as much as the oversight committee’s view.

“For people in our community that are skeptical of what the administration says and what the School Board says, we hope to offer an independent voice and independently reached conclusions that I hope will be credible to those people,” Pierce said.

Both groups said they plan to continue to meet to discuss the 2013–14 budget and long-term funding solutions.


COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


INCREDIBLE! Only in education are decisions made from outside entities!  School reform should begin with the makeup of school boards!  Administrators and school boards cannot or will not make decisions because they are too busy being “politically correct” so as not to piss off community members who sometimes do not support decisions when they are made! Most recently, defeating the bond issue.  This is a complete joke!  School professionals know where cuts can be made and what the least effects on students will be but will not make decisions because it may hurt the community.  Well, the community defeated the bond issue and the community should share the burden of the consequences of cuts!  Closing schools, 4 day work week, pay for busing, dropping programs, etc. etc.  If none of these were options then communicate what cuts will be made if the bond does not pass!  Pretty simple.

If professionals in education cannot determine where and what cuts need to be made then it is high time those individuals are sent packing or are removed from governing bodies! (Adminstrators and board members)

I can just see the airport authority board members going into St. Mary’s Hospital and examining their budget to make cuts for them can’t you? Or maybe the doctors from Community and St. Mary’s heading to District courts to help determine budgets for our DA?

We have people on committees, God bless them, giving up their time to dissect the school district budget to make recommendations for budget cuts who have never spent one day in a classroom or followed a teacher or administrator to find out what REALLY happens in schools!  It is much easier to sit and listen to other “community professionals” determine where the cuts should come from?  Makes sense to me…...NOT!

It is about time professional educators quit taking it!  By “IT” I mean, being told what a poor job you are doing, and you don’t need this to do that, and you have 3 months off a year, and you are overpaid, and you have too many administrators, and you discipoine our kids too much, and I need this for my kid!  When are teachers going to say enough is enough?  Stand up and be counted!  I can think of no other profession where “outsiders” determine the outcome of evaluations, pay, and company decisions!  RIDICULOUS!

Page 1 of 1




TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy