County leaders let voters judge tax, debt issues


20 largest counties weigh in anti-tax, -debt measures

County           Population                               Opposed? City and County of Denver       611,509 Yes

El Paso County           597,249 Yes

Arapahoe County             562,009 Yes

Jefferson County                 543,053 Yes

Adams County                   434,762 Yes

Boulder County           298,685 Yes

Larimer County           293,937 Yes

Douglas County           283,951 Yes

Weld County                     251,220 Yes

Pueblo County           157,389 Yes

Mesa County           144,440     No stance

Garfield County 57,050 Yes

City and County of Broomfield 54,796             Yes

Eagle County 54,044 Yes

La Plata County             50,735 Yes

Fremont County 48,034 Yes

Montrose County 41,302                 No stance

Delta County 31,600                 No stance

Morgan County 28,594 Yes

Summit County 26,547 Yes

— Source: Colorado Counties Inc., Daily Sentinel research

School boards, city councils and county commissions across Colorado have lined up in the last couple of months against Amendments 60 and 61 and Proposition 101, sounding the alarm that the tax-cutting and debt-limiting measures would gut their budgets.

But here on the politically and fiscally conservative Western Slope, a few elected boards have broken from the pack and refused to jump into the fray that pits supporters who say the measures would rein in out-of-control government spending against opponents who insist the measures would devastate the public and private sectors.

A Daily Sentinel review of the 20 most populous counties in the state found that only three county commissions — Delta, Mesa and Montrose — did not formally adopt resolutions opposing the measures and encouraging residents to do the same. All three commissions declined to take a stance, despite the fact all three counties stand to lose millions of dollars in revenue if voters approve any or all of the measures.

Although commissioners in the three counties said they personally are opposed to Amendments 60 and 61 and Proposition 101, they cited a number of reasons for not jumping on the bandwagon against them as elected officials. Some said they didn’t see any value in doing so. Others indicated they thought encouraging their constituents to vote a certain way could backfire on them.

“I was never gung-ho about the Board of County Commissioners officially opposing it, simply because I don’t think it helps,” Mesa County Commissioner Janet Rowland said. “In fact, I almost think it hurts because this election year is really the year of the rebellion. I don’t think hearing elected officials suggest that people vote no on an amendment that would decrease their taxes is going to be very helpful at all.”

Commissioner Craig Meis said he didn’t feel it was appropriate for the board to weigh in because it could appear to be self-serving.

He and Rowland said that although they will vote against Amendments 60 and 61 and Proposition 101, they understand why the measures are on the ballot and probably would have voted for all of them if their scope had been limited to repealing the increase in vehicle-registration fees and the mill-levy freeze.

“But unfortunately they went way above and beyond that and are simply just now trying to decimate not only state but local government,” Meis said.

Commissioner Steve Acquafresca said he, too, is opposed to the measures and would have supported the board taking a public stand against them. At the same time, he said, “I’m not sure that it means a great deal that we did not.”

Delta County Commissioner Olen Lund said he didn’t feel it’s the board’s place to instruct county residents.

“We haven’t taken a position on those because our position is the government works for the people and doesn’t tell the people what to do,” he said.

As a private citizen, Lund said, he’ll vote against the measures because he believes it would be difficult to amend them in the future.

“I’m not nearly as concerned about the financial impact of them as I am the fact that it is creating something in the state constitution that (is) really hard to tweak when (it needs) to be tweaked in the future,” he said.

Montrose County spokeswoman Kristin Modrell said all three commissioners there are opposed to the measures. But Commissioner Ron Henderson said the board declined to take a stand because it felt arguments on both sides had been thoroughly explained to the public.

“We felt that because of that vetting it was really not necessary for the county commissioners to get involved,” Henderson said.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
Advertiser Tearsheet

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy