Drilling for gas, with gas

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*


Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Every now and then a story of progress emerges. WPX is embracing this technology because it has proved economically beneficial. The same is true for their discontinued use of frack sand in certain tight sand formations and using horizontal drilling to reach further from a single pad. As a sidebar, they decrease pollution. It is diminishing that these steps must be economically beneficial more so than pollution abating, but still, kudos for doing them. I would however, suggest the next step be the replacement of the slickwater fluids of fracking with liquified NG with the subsequent recovery of product. This latter improvement can reduce pollution, health and safety for collateral neighborhoods. Perhaps the savings might justify it by taking out third party frackers, using cheap available product, transportation and obscene valuable water usage. There would still be “produced” water, but the additional toxic chemicals would be gone and the volumes for treatment would be reduced.



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy