Email letters, October 4,  2013

To Continue Reading, Please Log In


Forgot your password?

7-day subscribers of The Daily Sentinel have unlimited access to all digital content with their log-in. Guests must register for limited access -- 12 articles a month.

Already a 7-day subscriber? Start here to activate your online access.
Don't have a username and password? Register now

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

As evidenced by the above on-line letters, Thursday’s Sentinel editorial (“Point made, now reopen government”) and Dr. Michael Pramenko’s guest column (“Cruz and tea party want to overturn the results of last year’s election”) exposed just how deeply the cynically disingenuous misinformation campaign waged by ObamaCare’s opponents has permeated the Sentinel’s readership.
 
Thus, Bud Markos’ fact-free missive (“House Republicans must continue to fight against Obamacare”) is based on the unstated premise that the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) will be worse for the U.S. than a government shutdown, a debt ceiling default, and/or a return to the “pre-existing condition” of our previous out-of-control health care “system”.

Louis Dunn (“Dr. Pramenko’s column sparks thoughts on modifications”) falsely implies that Repugnicans have offered an actuarially viable alternative to the ACA, while failing to mention that it remains stalled in a House committee, would cost $1 trillion more than “ObamaCare” over ten years, and would employ the same approach that already failed in California, Florida, North Carolina, and Texas.

David Zulian (“Dr. Pramenko continues to mistakenly boost Affordable Care Act”) calls the ACA “socialized medicine”, when it originated as a “conservative”, market-based proposal—endorsed by Club 20 and Colorado’s Republican Governor Owens, and then successfully implemented in Massachusetts as “RomneyCare”.

At least David Wetherell (“Editorial on shutdown shows bias against conservatives”)  admits that the debate is purely ideological – not evidence-based.  Wetherell’s brand of “conservatism” might have more credibility had Sarah Palin and Chuck Grassley not falsely convinced gullible voters that “ObamaCare” created “death panels” – when the ACA statutorially eliminated hundreds of real “death panels” used by private for-profit health insurers to deny and/or cancel coverage based on “pre-existing conditions”.

How long can such “conservatives” cling to the same ideological arguments used against Social Security and MediCare to now deny millions access to affordable health care?



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy