Fatal flaw in socialism clearly shown once Obamacare actually took effect

The fatal flaw in socialism – whether wholesale, as it is practiced in Western Europe, or whether it is the watered-down variety, as proffered by President Obama and his governing…




COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


As a graduate of Mesa State College (before it became a bona fide institution of higher “learning”), perennial Republican propagandist Josh Penry can be forgiven for confusing the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) with “socialism”.  (“Fatal flaw in socialism clearly shown once Obamacare actually took effect”).

By definition, “socialism” is “a theory of social organization based on government ownership, management, or control of the means of production and the distribution and exchange of goods”.

For 80% of Americans, the ACA is essentially a market-driven approach – conceived by anti-socialist “conservatives” – that reforms (but does not exert “ownership, management, or control” over health insurers and/or the health care “system”), but relies on selective regulations and enhanced competition between insurers to improve the distribution of affordable health care services.

For 15% of Americans, the ACA would expand inarguably “socialist” Medicaid to make affordable health care accessible to millions.

While Penry concedes that the ACA is a “variety” of “watered down” socialism, his own conflated definition would encompass most public policy proposals envisioned by both our Constitution’s Preamble and the Gettysburg Address.

What Penry fails to admit is that the “pre-existing condition” proffered by the pre-ACA health insurance “system” – with double-digit annual premium increases, arbitrary denial and/or cancellation of coverage by profit-driven “death panels”, and annual/lifetime caps – “doesn’t work very well”.

Indeed, for 98.5% of Americans, the ACA works better than Penry’s now-discredited “alternative”.  As reported by the Council of Economic Advisers (“Trends in Health Care Cost Growth and the Role of the Affordable Care Act”, November 2013), the growth of overall health care spending and price inflation are both at their lowest in 50+ years, resulting in a 10% ($147 billion) reduction in the CBO’s projections of future Medicare/Medicaid spending.

“Government of the people, by the people, and for the people” is not “socialism”.

And Hugenburg blowing his own horn. Shouldn’t lecture Penry or anyone on the Constitution of the US. By definition what would the democrap scrapping the filibuster rules and thereby changing the US Constitution be called. Communism? Gestapoism? I think you should demand a refund from where ever you received your education. Democrap U? Liar CC? Black Panther Street College? Oh! I know the University of Hill and Limpwilly where nancy pelosi is president. Take note old Bill is spousing barry hussein soetoros once prud nam of obamadoesntcare to the now cliche “Affordable Care Act.” Pffft

Contrary to Jerry Sanders’ mistaken belief, most sentient Sentinel readers know that changing the Senate’s filibuster rules did not “change the U.S. Constitution”, but rather restored it—to majority rule.

Of course, based on this and his past screes, facts just don’t matter to Jerry.

While the Sentinel’s editorial on filibuster reform (“Senate goes nuclear”) aptly observes that both Democrats and Republicans have “routinely used the filibuster to block” and/or delay presidential appointments to executive and judicial positions requiring the Senate to “advise and consent”, it implies a “false equivalency” by disingenuously downplaying the extent to which Republicans have unprecedentedly escalated the proliferation of purely obstructive (with no claim of substantive basis) filibusters to stymie President Obama.

Thus, Republican President George Bush encountered only 130 cloture votes in response to Democrats’ filibusters, while President Obama has confronted 307 (by some counts, over 400) such votes as to Republicans’ filibusters – of virtually every kind if legislative initiative except renaming post offices.  Indeed, Republican Senators have repeatedly filibustered their own bills – as soon as President Obama embraced their proposals. 

As to presidential judicial and executive branch appointments, Bush endured only 38 such filibusters in eight years, while President Obama has been subjected to 81 in less than five years.  In fact, in the entire history of the U.S. Senate, only 68 presidential nominees were filibustered prior to President Obama’s inauguration, but 79 since then.  Moreover, on average, President Obama’s judicial nominees have waited roughly three times longer for eventual confirmation than did Bush’s. 

Therefore, Colorado’s two Democratic Senators – Michael Bennet and Mark Udall—have appropriately defended their filibuster-changing votes (“Senators defend filibuster vote, cite ‘obstruction’”), reforms which are clearly authorized by Article I, Section 5, of our Constitution – and which restored constitutionally-sanctioned “majority rule”.

Meanwhile, PolitiFacts rates Republicans’ excuses for their conduct as “mostly false”.

Nevertheless, at least one woefully misinformed Sentinel reader believes that Democrats actually “changed the U.S. Constitution” by reforming the Senate’s filibuster rules, while Josh Penry ignorantly claims that the Affordable Care Act constitutes “socialism”.

Perhaps the Daily Sentinel should report more facts.

Page 1 of 1






Search More Jobs






THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy