Gay marriage ruling reflects changing views

Nearly a year to the day after the U.S. Supreme Court declared a portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional, a federal appeals court, in a sweeping decision, ruled that states cannot prevent gay couples from getting married.

Gay marriage proponents say that Wednesday’s decision by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals should compel Colorado Attorney General John Suthers to stop defending a state ban on same-sex marriage.

We disagree — but not for substantive reasons. There’s a process to be followed.

It was certainly premature for the office of the Boulder County clerk to begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses the same day the ruling was announced. Suthers said that until there’s a final court resolution, the licenses are not valid and the state’s ban on same-sex marriage remains in effect.

He’s right. Plus, he’s obligated to enforce state law and the ban remains Colorado law.

Though Suthers must defend the law, the writing’s on the wall. The 10th Circuit took note of the rapidly changing views on gay marriage, stating “the seed has grown” since the Supreme Court’s decision on DOMA. We are astonished at the speed with which Americans have flipped on this issue. Indeed, the Sentinel reversed its own long-held opposition to gay marriage in 2010.

Interestingly, the appellate court’s decision technically addressed only Utah’s statute, but appeared to declare all such bans unconstitutionally discriminatory based on the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

The court wrote, “We hold that the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right to marry, establish a family, raise children and enjoy the full protection of a state’s marital laws.”

The narrow holding of the decision, however, only invalidated Utah’s ban. It will certainly be cited in what we anticipate will be a flurry of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of Colorado’s ban.

The court put the ruling on hold pending an appeal. The attorneys general in Utah and Oklahoma will certainly appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. We expect Colorado to join Utah and Oklahoma, or submit briefing on behalf of the state.

Colorado voters approved a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in 2006, two years after Massachusetts became the first state to allow gay marriage. Colorado approved same-sex civil unions last year.

We continue to believe that states should get out of the business of sanctifying marriage of any kind, leaving that to religious institutions while states authorize civil unions between heterosexuals or homosexuals.

Nevertheless, Wednesday’s ruling is an unequivocal statement that this federal circuit regards marriage as a fundamental right for everyone, regardless of sexual orientation.

The Supreme Court will have the final word. We expect current trends to continue.


COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


TOP JOBS
  • Healthcare Opportunities

    MindSpringHealth.org WestSpringHospital.orgEMPLOYMENT OPPORTU...

  • Plumbing, A/c Tech

    Plumbing A/C Techneeded. Experienced, licensed preferred. Must pass b...

  • Delivery Route

    BUSINESS OPPORTUNITYWould you like to deliver newspapersa...

  • Roofing Laborers

    Experiencedneeded for immediate hire. Wage dependent on experience. TPO,...

  • Leasing Agent - Ft

    APARTMENT LEASING CONSULTANT - FULL-TIMESeeking a full time (40 hours a week...

  • Delivery Route

    BUSINESS OPPORTUNITYWould you like to deliver newspapers as an

Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Advertiser Tearsheet
Information

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy