Hard positions and hard feelings, 
both sides are sinners on fracking

To Continue Reading, Please Log In


Forgot your password?

7-day subscribers of The Daily Sentinel have unlimited access to all digital content with their log-in. Guests must register for limited access -- 12 articles a month.

Already a 7-day subscriber? Start here to activate your online access.
Don't have a username and password? Register now

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

One of my favorite bumper stickers from the 1980’s energy bust still applies today…

If you’re out of work, broke and hungry…EAT AN ENVIRONMENTALIST.

Another one I like is… Ban coal mining…let the bastards freeze in the dark.

Kudos to Charles Ashby and the Sentinel for finally revealing the full text of the insipid letter from five Republican state legislators to Patagonia’s CEO Casey Sheahan (“Firm holds steady in its opposition to fracking process”), along with Sheahan’s apt demurrer.

As Jim Spehar chronicles (“Hard positions and hard feelings; both sides are sinners on fracking”), the fracking “debate” is fraught with misinformation – as that letter proves.

Thus, State Senator Steve King, et al., falsely claim that Patagonia’s informed “position is not based on any facts about the real world of fracing”, implying that these political hacks and industry-supported shills have somehow acquired superior expertise.

Likewise, King, et al., falsely assert that “[f]racing is a proven technology that our state regulatory agency has determined does no harm to the environment or to the water table”.
At best, fracking is a rapidly evolving technology, the actual and/or potential harms of which to the environment and/or water table have not yet been indisputably proven.

As Spehar also suggests, fracking’s advocates routinely rely on a disingenuously narrow definition of “fracing”, ignoring the impacts of a more inclusive inventory of the overall drilling process.  Nevertheless, even “our state regulatory agency” has adopted a panoply of fracking-related rules – precisely because fracking chemicals are indeed hazardous.

Moreover, no one can be fully “aware of the technical details of” fracking – because of the “Halliburton Exceptions” to the Safe Drinking Water Act (exempting fracking wells from regulation as “underground injection wells”, as Congress originally intended) and the Clean Water Act (exempting fracking fluids from EPA regulation as “pollutants”).

Most revealingly, these hypocritical “conservatives” question Patagonia’s concern for “real people”, while opposing Patagonia’s financial support to “real people” seeking to restrict fracking within their own local communities – at least until the entire process is subject to adequate, un-exempted, scientifically-based state and/or federal regulation.



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy