In the end, there is truth

One of America’s founding principles is the public’s right to know what their government is doing. The framers of the Constitution mentioned no exceptions, not even for national security, but a free press was permanently enshrined in the First Amendment, because a vigilant citizenry was — and is — the only sure long-term guardian of our liberties.

That is why Americans often make heroes of those who expose wrong-doing, like Sen. Thomas Walsh, who outed the bribery scandal at Teapot Dome that sent an Interior Secretary to prison, or Peter Buxton, the brave young health official who exposed horrific Tuskegee experiments that injected black men with horrible diseases. Journalism students will always study the exploits of Woodward and Bernstein in uncovering Watergate, and of Gary Webb, the San Jose writer whose “Dark Alliance” articles revealed CIA complicity in the 1990s California drug trade.

Last week saw another textbook example of such cover-ups with the release of an Inspector General’s final report on EPA actions that resulted in poisoning the Animas River in 2015 with toxic sludge from the Gold King Mine above Silverton. Two years of government investigations and reports have been increasingly implausible, revealing government officials determined to blame someone else for their incompetence.

My friend Rob Gordon ran a year-long investigation of the disaster as staff director of the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. His comprehensive analysis, in the June 14 Daily Signal, shows both a shocking level of incompetence, and an obfuscation by EPA officials trying to deny, hide, and transfer blame. It is fascinating reading for those with calm tempers, and it reveals a golden opportunity for the new administration.

Administrator Scott Pruitt is committed to refocusing the EPA on its core mission, shifting from reliance on punitive enforcement toward more positive environmental partnerships, and ending the secrecy surrounding many agency practices. As Gordon says, the Gold King Mine cover-up provides a great chance for Mr. Pruitt and his team to demonstrate a new and improved EPA.

Ending this cover-up would not be difficult; all the documents needed to get at the truth are already in the government’s possession. Clearly, EPA officials knew the old mine had a collapsed tunnel, behind which water had accumulated, as is common in many mines. Fine clay and soil eventually filled the gap and formed a natural plug, and the pool of water behind it had built up considerable pressure. EPA knew this, as did the state, the Bureau of Reclamation, and the EPA’s contractor. Yet the contractor, working to drain the water, went way beyond inserting a drainpipe and actually dug away the plug, which blew out under the pressure, flooding the river for hundreds of miles, jeopardizing important water supplies in Colorado and New Mexico. Anyone else would have paid millions in fines, and probably gone to jail.

EPA’s internal report called the disaster an “incident,” asserting that its crew was just clearing a bedrock face, not touching the plug. Somehow, they claim, the bedrock just crumbled and the mine plug blew. The Interior Department produced an independent report, saying EPA had discussed a different plan, but was nebulous about why the contractor excavated the plug, contrary to that plan. The Corps of Engineers, asked to peer-review Interior’s report, questioned why it was considered urgent to dig out the plug, rather than wait for Reclamation’s technical guidance as planned.

The night before a congressional hearing, EPA issued an addendum, explaining that a vacationing supervisor had given written instructions to his substitute, outlining steps to remove part of the plug. The report nevertheless claims he verbally told the crew not to do so. Now the final Inspector General’s report repeats the same company line: that the crew was digging high above the plug, preparing the site for the experts to examine, when the mine inexplicably burst open. However, as Gordon points out, the congressional committee now has the written internal memos, emails, and photographs proving otherwise.

EPA’s new leadership should uncover the truth, tell the public exactly what happened, rid the payroll of those responsible, and implement measures to see that it never happens again.

Some government secrets remain forever enshrouded in mystery: the rabbit that attacked Jimmy Carter, the Philadelphia Experiment, and the Roswell UFO incident. But it is time for this EPA cover-up to end; the truth will come out anyway. As Churchill said “Truth is incontrovertible; ignorance can deride it, panic may resent it, malice may destroy it, but in the end, there it is.”

Greg Walcher is president of the Natural Resources Group and author of “Smoking Them Out: The Theft of the Environment and How to Take it Back.” He is a Western Slope native.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

Mr. Walcher does what far too many do.  He blames the “government” and its employees for incompetence and cover-ups.  There is some truth in that, and it has become standard practice, not only in government but in private enterprise as well.  However, in his treatment of the errors and failings of others, he neglects the culpability of those who created the conditions or situations that needed to be “cleaned up”, all too frequently at taxpayer expense.

It does absolutely no good to complain about these situations, not if, at the very same time, we are ourselves creating similar situations that will have to be cleaned up, as well as paid for, by future generations.  So, while we are cleaning up one mess, we are creating similar ones.  That, to some of us, doesn’t make much sense and, if such as Mr. Walcher is not willing to hold those accountable for the messes they create, allowing them to proceed in their endeavors, and provides a way for them to escape accountability, Mr. Walcher is not at all serious about treating the issue of pollution of all types.

When some of us were young we wert taught to “clean up your own mess”.  Quite obviously Mr. Walcher was not taught that, or has long since forgotten it.  Or perhaps, it is because it is the money that speaks to him and corporations and other large financial interests should be exempt from that rule.

Sorry Mr. Walcher, but until those corporations and their executives are held to those same standards, and not excused in any way, such as what Mr. Walcher decries (the Gold King Mine) events will continue to occur.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy