Modern culture, not gun ownership, is behind psychopathic violence

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*

Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Kudos Mr. Wagner. You’ve got my vote if and when you ever run for political office.

Unfortunately, the Sentinel saw fit to offset Rick Wagner’s excellent right-on-the-money piece with the leftist totalitarian propaganda blather of Mike Littwin, although that column (see the quoted article in its entirety as “Littwin: Never mind secession, we got sheriffs” at didn’t appear in the online Sentinel. (Interested persons can learn more about Littwin in the article “Mike Littwin on his Denver Post ouster and new Colorado Independent challenge” at
Littwin is quite a cutesy pie (as is the Sentinel by implication) in his approach to what society should deem to be constitutional. He (as do all leftists) totally ignores the fact that various U.S. Supreme Court majorities have outright lied to the American people when they decided to implement central-bankster-tyranny-friendly policies. See such revisionist-history lies as M’Culloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316 (1819) (, Legal Tender Cases (Knox v. Lee, Parker v. Davis), 79 U.S. (12 Wallace) 457 (1870) (,, Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) (,  and the so-called “Gold Clause” cases (
The question arises: what is a county sheriff supposed to do when the U.S. Supreme Court lies to the American people on behalf of a fraudulent global debt-as-money central banking oligarchy? If Littwin and his ilk were to have their way, the oath taken by law enforcement officers to defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, would have no meaning whatsoever. So why bother taking the oath? Why doesn’t the MSM Sentinel ask “Big Brother” Littwin that question? I would challenge both Littwin and the Sentinel editorial writer/s to answer that question with a recognizable level of transparency and intellectual honesty. Perhaps both are too ignorant to be involved in an intellectually serious and honest discussion about such issues. Inquiring minds would like to know.
I would correct Rick on only his point: “the fear his [shooting perp] political beliefs might somehow damage the prevailing narrative from the left … doesn’t help anyone’s understanding.” That point seems to presume that the left ever sincerely wants to “help anyone’s understanding.” That presumption is entirely incorrect. The totalitarian Left’s propaganda narrative is deliberately designed to strategically obfuscate clarity and understanding. That’s what makes it so evil, dangerous and unacceptable. It is anathematical to intellectual honesty and the provable facts of history.
Given his apparent 2nd Amendment-friendly attitude, I would trust Sheriff John Cooke’s beliefs on the subject of constitutionality a lot more than those of cutesy pie Mike Littwin and his ilk.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Subscribe to print edition
Sign in to your account

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy