North Fork Valley gas leases 
should be withdrawn by BLM

To Continue Reading, Please Log In


Forgot your password?

7-day subscribers of The Daily Sentinel have unlimited access to all digital content with their log-in. Guests must register for limited access -- 12 articles a month.

Already a 7-day subscriber? Start here to activate your online access.
Don't have a username and password? Register now

COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Thanks for the column.  Unfortunately, the BLM only issued an Environmental Assessment and still maintains that its failure to properly consider impacts from oil and gas development in the North Fork in its 1989 plan and EIS is sufficient to lease these lands under it nonetheless today.

Given the many resources at stake, landscape level planning is warranted as a first step to update the badly out-of-date plan.  Certainly an EIS is required at this juncture, given the terribly stale nature of the 1980s RMP, and the prudent course would be for the agency to prioritize finishing its RMP revision that it has been working on for years.  It is unfortunate that the State Director of BLM is taking this course, but the issues that made this a bad idea last winter, makes it a bad idea this winter. 

Protests are due 12/17 and the petition to the White House can be found here https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/withdraw-blm-oilgas-leases-colorados-premier-organic-farming-region-and-update-blms-25-year-old-land/cFjBGbDM

Info is at http://www.citizensforahealthycommunity.org

http://www.theconservationcenter.org 

http://www.northforkaction.com



TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy