Only talk is cheap when 
it comes to health care

We’re supposedly the model for community health care here in Mesa County. But that doesn’t mean we’re without problems.

That’s one takeaway from last Thursday’s discussion of Sustainable Health Care Solutions sponsored by the Club 20 Foundation and the Colorado Trust. About 100 of your invited neighbors participated in the examination of attitudes regarding health care, one of 25 gatherings taking place across western Colorado. Here are some of our problems:

We smoke more than our fellow Coloradans and compared to all Americans. We weigh a little less when compared to the entire country, but a little more than other residents of our state.

The good news is our network of health care professionals, with the exception of nurses, is better staffed than elsewhere in the state. Even so, as I’ve experienced, you might not get to actually talk with your doc absent an appointment. It’ll more likely be intermediaries handling questions or dealing with things like prescription problems.

Here in Happy Valley and elsewhere in western Colorado, we don’t live in isolation from growing national health care problems.

We were told last week, that health expenditures will soar to more than one-third of the U.S. economy by 2040.

We spend more per capita on health care than Germany, Canada, France, Australia and the United Kingdom but have a lower life expectancy than any of those countries.

Compounding all that is the fact we’re also living longer. Back in 1940, a 65-year-old was expected to live another 13 years. That’s up to 18 years today and is expected to hit 22 years in 2080. The care we baby boomers will need toward the end of our life is some of the most expensive to provide.

Whether you call it the Affordable Care Act or more derisively, “Obamacare,” whether you think it takes us in the right direction or down the path to socialism and death panels, it seems clear we need to make some changes, both in taking charge of our lifestyle choices and in how, as a society, we deal with the provision of health services.

Right now we do that when the hospital bills for those of us with insurance are marked up to offset the costs of emergency room care for those without. You might rail against mandates, but show me another way to get young, uninsured healthy folks who would rather put their cash toward a new mountain bike or kayak to contribute to the system that patches them up when they crash on the trail or bounce off a rock in the river.

More than half of us in the room last Thursday received health care via our employers. You may not like a single-payer system — most Americans apparently don’t — but doesn’t relying on our employers to fund health care place them at a disadvantage against competitors in countries where that’s not the case? If so, why do many job providers reflexively fight against changes that could make them more competitive?

Another problem is we don’t know what our health care costs. Or what’s real — provider billings or Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement rates.

Only once, in 66 years as a consumer, have I been offered cost-based choice for a medical procedure. Then, though insurance would have covered any option, it seemed silly to ding my insurer for the $1,100 cost of a colonoscopy at one facility when another would do exactly the same check for $450. I saved “the system” $650 just being able to compare costs.

A few months ago, I couldn’t get an estimate of the cost of relatively commonplace arthroscopic surgery. When’s the last time you made a major purchase and just said “Bill me later and let me know what I owe you?”

What’s clear is that what we’re doing now regarding health care is problematic. 

It’s become, perhaps necessarily, more impersonal. We’re divorced, the insured among us, from the actual costs of our own health care.

Our providers are shifting the costs of caring for the uninsured, under-insured and those of us on Medicare, Medicaid and other programs, mostly to the employers who provide coverage for their workers. Too many of us have no insurance at all.

And yet we fight change. Go figure.

Jim Spehar’s anxious to see whether this latest health care discussion is “progress” or just “activity.” Your thoughts are welcome at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

The letters of Joseph A. Luff and Bill Marvel are right on the money.
The term “affordable health care” is an Economics 101 deception from start to finish. What is “affordable” for George Soros and Bill Gates is far from “affordable” for the average Joe. Why not talk about “affordable” Rolls Royces or “affordable” Lamborghinis?! That makes just as much sense as Jim Spehar’s obfuscating blather. I mean, give me a break! Just how stupid does your average liberal politician think we are? To any person who has read “Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis”, by Ludwig Von Mises ( and “The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism”, by Friedrich Hayek ( Spehar’s musings can only seem amusing, disgusting, or both.
“Affordable” health care means doctors get to work for free. That the healthcare industry has led inflation for forty years would seem to justify a bit of an “it serves them right” attitude, but that wouldn’t help anything.
One thing guys like Spehar won’t talk about much is the fact the unfunded liabilities of SS and Medicare are figured to be in the neighborhood of $222 trillion. That’s a scary figure which illuminates the self-evident unsustainability of the global neofeudalistic debt-as-money fraud.
We are at the point of either 1) forgiving all debts or 2) collecting all debts. The latter will prove difficult because Americans have over 400 million guns and will be reluctant to accept a “New World Order” variety of global serfdom to the debt-as-money oligarchs.
The main problem inherent with OKenyancare is that, thanks to five revisionist-history Supremes, it forcibly takes away our one and only REAL natural defense against the price of any product being too high: the constitutional right to not buy it.
There are two basic things about political manipulators like Spehar that particularly get my goat. One, they just don’t comprehend the Economics 101 self-evident truth that nobody, and I mean NOBODY, whether as individuals or groups, has enough brains and righteousness to successfully control wages and prices for a whole nation’s economy. The other is that they do not believe in the empirically observable material realities of the universe. They actually believe they are a higher form of life than the rest of us, and that if they can only think up something clever enough to say that the rest of us will believe it, and that politically manipulated “belief” will then actually BE reality.
No personal insult intended toward the basic humanity of the Spehars and OKenyans of the world, but I call “B.S.” on that.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
Advertiser Tearsheet

© 2015 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy