Pooling of resources has worked on OM

Three decades after Mesa County, the city of Grand Junction and School District 51 jointly agreed to build and operate a community swimming pool on Orchard Mesa, it certainly makes sense for Mesa County — or either of the other two entities — to re-examine that agreement.

But the unilateral decision by Mesa County last year to abandon the agreement and stop making its annual payments for the pool — done with barely any notice to the other participants and accomplished with nothing more than a memo from the county administrator at the time — was a poor way to go about it.

That action was taken under the auspices of the previous county commissioners. We’re pleased to learn that the current commissioners, especially Rose Pugliese, want to take a more public and cooperative approach to deciding whether to permanently rescind the agreement. Pugliese said she wants to hear from city officials and the public before reaching a final decision, which could come later this summer.

Good for her. However, we think more time should be allowed to obtain input from the public. After all, there is no immediate pressing need to reach a final decision on the future of the agreement.

The commissioners, of course, may still go ahead with rescinding the agreement. But before they do, we hope they will consider several other items.

First, the three-way agreement has worked well for over 31 years to maintain the pool, which is used by both school students and members of the community. The three entities have worked together —  with the school district primarily responsible for paying the electric bills — to keep the pool operational during times when local government entities were relatively flush with cash and during far more difficult economic times than now, such as in the wake of the oil shale bust.

Equally important, if the county abandons its historic funding contribution for the pool, the burden of keeping the pool open will fall more heavily on the city, and perhaps eventually on the school district. But all three local government entities are funded by the taxpayers of this valley, so the county may be doing little more than shifting citizens’ burdens to other parts of their tax bills.

For now, the county’s decision not to pay for 2012 and its consideration of abandoning the agreement altogether means the city will have to pay the county’s share. But, with new City Council members who have also questioned the city’s involvement in non-essential projects, it’s not clear how long that commitment would last if the county isn’t involved. School District 51, beset with its own budget problems and new mandates imposed by the Legislature, has few resource it can add.

Of course, there is another option: to close the Orchard Mesa Pool and save all three entitities the money they’ve been spending on it. But an abandoned, empty and locked- up pool would be a sad testament to what this community values most.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

This is not the first time county commissioners have balked on paying their share in renovating and upgrading facilities shared by partners.  As sitting members of PIAB Mr. Aquafresca represented the county position and had the county pull any of its share of upgrading Stocker stadium several years ago.  JUCO, CMU, The city of GJ, and the District 51 all partnered with a grant from the Denver Broncos to provide for new turf and the county did not contribute!

What bothered me more was the comment later from county reps that they were not recognized as contributors for the project!

What bothers me now is the co-op for OM pool has worked great for 30 years, there is no recreation center in a city our size, and county commissioners now want to shift the burden of cost to other entities so they can play politics and get us to believe they are good stewards of our tax dollars.  What a joke!

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy