Printed letters, July 3, 2012

The June 26 “Commentary” section was an absolute delight. Jim Spehar’s follow-up on the response to his earlier column regarding the Western Slope Conservative Alliance and the local county sheriffs was priceless.

I must admit I was flummoxed that not one of the sheriffs offered to introduce the people from far-right field at that meeting to kind professionals who can help them get over their paranoia. Spehar’s original column pretty much captured my incredulity upon reading the original story in The Daily Sentinel.

The letter the editor from Susie Adamson was helpful in explaining where the craziness was coming from. Almost nothing she said was true.

Readers can follow up on this themselves by going to, where they can find a searchable data base of all executive orders by President Obama (not one relates to domestic gun control) and where they can read the actual text of Agenda 21, which has been around since ‘92. The UN hasn’t marched through Fruita and taken anyone’s guns yet.

Then George Will, whom I used to respect, comes out half-cocked over the Law of the Sea Treaty and continues with more paranoid lies. For the record, the United States has veto power over the work of the International Seabed Authority; the seabed authority is run by state parties to the treaty, not by the United Nations and all former living Republican secretaries of state now support the treaty’s ratification by the Senate.

Having a legitimate policy concern based on actual facts is one thing. But this fear-mongering causes me to wonder who gains when ordinary citizens are subjected to lies and distortion of truth that leads them to worry and badger sheriffs over imaginary plots by the UN or the president instead of the very real issues of drugs, violence and crime on the Western Slope.

It certainly isn’t the democratic process or our country or its citizens.



Spehar’s recent columns destroy his credibility

“Jim, it tells me that my community is very tolerant of intolerant people like you,” was my response to Jim Spehar as quoted at the end of his column last week in The Daily Sentinel. True to form, Spehar still doesn’t get it.

He cited some quotes from emails he had received in response to his irresponsible depiction of an event he didn’t attend. He also quoted from a conversation I had with him that ended with me saying, “Jim, the saddest part of all this is my disappointment in you.”

Let me tell you why I’m disappointed in Spehar. The Western Slope Conservative Alliance’s Sheriffs Forum was attended by a spectrum of people that included the leader of Occupy Grand Junction and some of his friends, conservatives, pro-Second Amendment activists and one Democratic spy.

The attendees, except for perhaps the spy, were ordinary citizens who have a genuine concern about the future of their country. My request for a retraction of Spehar’s inaccurate remarks was actually an opportunity for Spehar to redeem himself from the embarrassing journalistic blunder of writing an opinion piece about an event of which he had no personal knowledge.

Spehar opined about this event, from which he was absent, and based his comments on hearsay. My request for an apology was an opportunity for him to retract his insults aimed at everyone who attended the sheriffs forum.

Spehar seems to be proud of the fact that, regarding my requests for a retraction and an apology, “She got neither.” This is where he really doesn’t get it.

His days of sitting on a happy cloud writing reckless commentaries with impunity are over. The fact that he thinks his columns reflect the majority opinion in western Colorado will doom him. His continued portrayals of conservatives, citizens, patriots and concerned Americans as kooks have already destroyed his credibility.


Grand Junction


County candidates need to address significant issues

We have heard from various candidates in the Republican primary about who is the stronger conservative and who is more concerned about the constitutional rights of the voters (which are unlikely to be affected by anything a county commissioner does except for some property issues such as changing boundaries of the buffer zones).

I am sure there are some voters out there who still wonder whether the candidates are “with us or against us,” as was so succinctly posed to Sheriff Hilkey. But when will we hear about positions on such issues as the sheriff’s budget and his handling of the Clifton area; jail overcrowding; the road department and if it intends to ignore the Clifton area; panhandlers; the creation of more special taxing districts similar to the one that was recently dissolved in the Fruitvale/Clifton area because that process was botched so badly; and, finally, how to notify the public when a member of the commission plans to attend any meetings at which resolutions may be adopted that will be presented to the full commission for adoption?

Those are the issues that are going to affect this community. To date, the candidates have said so very little about them that I sometimes wonder if I have gone deaf or can’t read anymore.




Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

Dennis, weren’t you at the event? Didn’t you sit next to Tim Fenwick?

Oops, that’s right you guys would never be at anything sponsored by the WSCA.

Dennis, ROTFLMAO. I always speak to anyone who approaches me. And I believe I did shake your hand on the way in, since I was playing traffic cop in the hallway.

We never limit who attends any of our events, which with June’s makes about 25 since I have been involved with the WSCA. Wonder how many you folks have put on in the same time?

Like you recognized, we even have some of the liberals attend our events. Eventually, the Conservative message may sink in. Let me know the next time you guys, well do anything other than complain.

Dennis, who writes this stuff for you? Oh that’s right Chuck Beauchamp.

First, I never deny anything I have written. I am proud that you guys would go back two years and read through my blog to find a quote and take it out of context.

If you can’t accept the reality of the way politics work and have worked in this state for 136 years, okay by me. Anyone who wishes to read the whole blog can Google it and read the whole thing. I am proud of the post and do not deny it.

At least I have the courage of my convictions to put my own name on what I write unlike your leader American Patriot, or as those that he hates know, Chuck Beauchamp.

I am proud of my writing and my stance. I am proud of what the WSCA has accomplished in the past two years. I will ask once again, what have you guys done in the same time frame other than have a pity party.

Oh, and having your leader post on Colorado Pols, the most Progressive & Liberal website in Colorado, hardly the sign of the Real TEA Party. ROTFLMAO.

Chuck, Chuck, Chuck…oops I mean Dennis Dennis Dennis.

I just asked for you to read all of the blog, I invite everyone to. I am proud of what I wrote and I put my name to it, unlike your leader Chuck aka American Patriot.

When some one is so afraid that all they can do is name call and attack, one wonders what might be in the past they are so afraid of. American Patriot would be more American and certainly more of Patriot if he had the courage to speak with his own name.

And I repeat Colorado Pols is the most Liberal/Progressive Website in Colorado, you might as well post on Pravada. Certainly not the stuff of the Real TEA Party.

Dennis, after our last exchange I found out how it really works. Someone may post from your computer, but is that really who writes it?

Chuck, enough with the veiled threats, you and I both know how the wonderful economy treated my business. Perhaps, you would like to open your records for everyone?

Your ability to investigate just proves how afraid you really must be. Again my past is my past and I accept what has happened to me. Why can’t you accept what has happened to you? Why can’t you and your minions be honest. Oh, that’s right, you might have to reveal something about your past, and we all know how you would hate to do that, how the truth might be exposed about you.

Finally, I don’t care who posts where, just don’t think that the Real TEA Party would be involved with anyone who supports this current administration or the fallacy of the last administration that the Government knows better about your life. You as The REAL TEA Party can post where ever, just don’t claim your high and mighty conservative roots, there is nothing Conservative about your group or you any more. How’s that for telling like it really is.

Please, for your own sake, cut the crap and look who and what you have aligned The Real TEA Party with. If you think for one second there is commonality, well, I’m thinkin’ you and most everyone else have a different version of what TEA Party means.

One time, your group had my respect. You yourself even proclaimed that I was a stand up guy. I haven’t changed so it must your group that has. You have never answered completely what chased so many of your group away. Good Conservatives like TF and the like. Nor have you ever explained just why, someone as patriotic as yourself, is not a registered voter?

Hope you had a wonderful 4th, again let me know when the next event your group puts on I’ll be glad to show up and support you, just like I have in the past. Too bad we can’t say the same about you, Chuck.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy