Printed letters, July 31, 2013

The efforts to convince us that our economy is “just fine” or “picking up” (or would be if we were just willing to share a little more of the burden with increased taxes) are ongoing and overwhelming.

On closer inspection, though, we see sales tax revenue is down as is property tax valuation. The EPA has instituted 6,000 new rules since 2012, further adding to our regulatory burdens.

Thus, the determined effort to close down energy development in the name of “responsible” development, along with scary stories about fracking and other evils, should be questioned. It is a well-known economic fact that a vibrant economy consists of workers spending their wages, buying homes and sending their children to our schools.

Additional benefits in western Colorado have come directly from energy in the form of direct payments to local governments and schools from energy profit on public lands. Much of western Colorado is federal land, and these benefits are, by law, shared locally. Thus we have PILT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes) funds and Secure Rural Schools funds which flow to counties and schools. These can be very significant ($800,000 to District 51 a year ago).

In 2012, however, the feds deducted $1.6 million from the 2011 payment. Secure Rural Schools funds also received a deduction of 6 percent for sequestration. School Trust Lands have had their equity captured, as well, notably in the closing of the Vermillion Basin, while coal revenues have declined by $13 million.

As a lifelong resident of Colorado with my entire adult life spent in Mesa County, I remember oil well rigs, slag heaps and sump ponds. It is a far different picture today, but, to listen to the environmentalists, you would not know this. It is gross misunderstanding of economics to believe that you can shut down this vital industry and still enjoy the quality of life that drew us to this area.

MARCIA NEAL

Grand Junction

 

 

Critics should understand 
different energy processes

If people want to condemn hydraulic fracturing and drilling, I would suggest they do in-depth studies of both, and I don’t mean what is out there by environmental groups. I mean studies by people who study what happens and the results from what was done.

Hydraulic fracturing and drilling are two totally separate operations with differing results to the same end. One frees the gas or oil, and the other gets you to the gas and oil. So, if you want to be for or against these, at least do an in-depth study before making a decision on what the effects are.

CURT CLAUSSEN

Grand Junction

 

Courts shouldn’t set bond
for most misdemeanors

Here are a few random observations on recent Mesa County and Grand Junction issues:

✓ The jail overcrowding problem is a self-created ploy to increase spending in the face of declining tax revenue. (Check your last assessed valuation notice. Mine was down by 25 percent, hence property taxes are less.)

The inept courts here need to stop requiring bond for every release from jail pending a trial. To have 88 inmates in jail for misdemeanors is absurd. Release nonviolent, non-recidivist arrestees on their own recognizance. just as traffic offenders are released every day. Most other states do this, and the FTA rate is no different than in Mesa County.

✓Janet Rowland, the former county commissioner, is dead wrong on the job of county government. Recently we spent a week in Jefferson County, where there are miles of open space, beautiful parks and a first-class recreation center.

The quality-of-life issue is subjective but in many ways Mesa County is not a draw for new businesses or upscale employees. It’s funny how Silverthorne and Breckenridge have beautiful rec centers built by the ski industry. Where is the Halliburton-Encana-Williams rec center here in Grand Junction?

✓ The City Council decision to appoint rather than hold a special election to fill the two vacancies is an arrogant disregard of the citizens’ right to elect their council representatives. I have no doubt the majority will find like-minded people to join them.

MIKE FITZMORRIS

Grand Junction

 

City politics are grist 
for new television show

Oh, my, aren’t politics so much fun here in ole Happy Valley? Now that we no longer have the no-brainer incident, we can move on to the other issue of the wicked witch of the north trying to, and mostly succeeding, manipulate the Grand Junction City Council.

And all this without even running or even attempting to actually get elected to a position on the council. Makes you wonder how many votes she’d get if she actually ran, instead of being the grand puppeteer pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Maybe this could all be turned into a soap opera that could all end up on one of those reality TV shows. It could be called “As the Valley Churns.”

JAMES OWEN

Fruita



COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


Marcia Neal ought to know better than just repeat outlandish claims picked up from the internet.  The EPA has not instituted 6,000 new rules since 2012.  The Federal Register has published 6,000 entries from all the federal agencies and “The thousands of entries run the gamut from meeting notifications to fee schedules to actual rules and proposed rule changes.” some are new regulations, others are revisions in regulations, still others are the various sorts of notice federal agencies are required—often by Laws of Congress to give. Such inflated, outrageous claims should be questioned.  Indeed.

Muddled thinking and assumption Curt!
“Critics should understand different energy processes”
“Hydraulic fracturing and drilling are two totally separate operations with differing results to the same end.”
“...if you want to be for or against these, at least do an in-depth study before making a decision on what the effects are.”
a. Solar         b. Natural (as Earth processed) 
  1. O&G (fuels, chemicals).    1. Geothermal        
  2. Wind         2. Tidal  
  3. Coal           3. Gravitational
  4. Direct sun conversion     4. Magnetic
  5. Biomass         5. Electrical
  6. Electrical       6. Radioactive
  Etc.
You get the idea – But your lead-in of differentiation doesn’t apply to fracking and drilling in that they are part and parcel of the tight sand and shale operations of extraction. The problems come from many aspects and critics can quite correctly lay issue to those aspects without in-depth study. For instance, sand is used to prop open fractures; poisonous in the ground – no; allowed fugitive dust in transfer operations – yes, a cause of silicosis and lung cancer. For fracking and drilling, one can abet and aid the other in malfunctions, so knowing they are different operations means nothing to criticizing of effects resulting from their use or misuse.  To say an up hole contamination was not fracking fault, but failure of drill hole cementing is a bogus or misleading claim of fault, in particular, if pressure tests indicate integrity of seal and the seal leaks after fracturing because the fracking caused the failure.
Finally,and it should be to your chagrin, most active people criticizing have studied “in-depth” the “effects” and affects of these operations.

Page 1 of 1






Search More Jobs






THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy