Printed letters, July 5, 2012

There has been (and will continue to be) much written and said about the recent Supreme Court decision upholding the Affordable Care Act, pejoratively known as Obamacare.

Once the wild histrionics have subsided, we hope that we can come to accept the notion that we are a civilized people who embrace the notion that all individuals have the essential human right to access basic medical care. Sometimes, we just have to have faith that such a principle is not wrong and move forward.

It may be a bumpy road. It’s kind of scary, too. What is this going to do to our taxes? No one has the right to tell me what I can and cannot do! Will people take advantage of the public goodwill?

Changes may need to come in the future to perfect this legislation. Remember, Social Security was not popularly welcomed in its time (socialism! communism!), yet we have come to accept it.

It is good to remind ourselves that, while we are a nation of individuals, sometimes radically so, we are capable of coming together for the common good. Let’s all just take a breath. This is a historic moment when we can choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing — to be inclusive or exclusive.

We believe we will choose to do what is right because that is who we are.

JANE & ANDY GOLDMAN

Montrose

Which gang of pirates should guard health treasure chest?

I believe health care should be handled by the rules of the free market. But then I thought, “Those at the forefront of the free market are the banks and Wall Streeters. Many of these leaders have taken obscene salaries, even while their companies collapsed and thousands lost their jobs. Many took government monies to bail themselves out while still making millions and billions. For them, greed was king. Maybe it’s not such a good idea that the free market handles health care.”

So, now I believe the government should handle health care. But then I thought, “Our elected officials are the ones who have amassed trillions of dollars of debt and raised the unemployment rate to more than 8 percent They have built bridges to nowhere, engaged in insider trading, voted retirement pensions for themselves that average Americans could only dream of and have performed their jobs in such a way that they have a 17 percent approval rating from the public. Is it really a good idea that this crowd should handle health care reform?”

So what it boils down to is: “Which gang of pirates would I trust to watch over the health care treasure chest?”

Frankly, I have zero confidence that either entity would lead in reform with the good of the American people in mind. America may need health care reform, but we’re in greater need of a moral and spiritual awakening.

TIMOTHY KING

Grand Junction

 

Justice Roberts’ decision exemplified impartiality

I never thought I’d hear myself say it: “Well done, Chief Justice Roberts!”

The truth is, as a retired judge myself, I know that without having read every word in the briefs and heard every word argued, I’m in no position to determine whether Chief Justice Roberts’ rulings were correct.

But I can appreciate what appears to be an impartial, non-political decision on Roberts’ part and a validation of the separation of powers our forefathers envisioned.

JOAN WOODWARD

Grand Junction

 

Once again Americans overreact to change

The slaves have been freed: The sky is falling. Women have the vote: The sky is falling. Income tax: The sky is falling.

The Civil Rights Act, schools are integrated: The sky is falling. Social Security and Medicare: The sky is falling. Gays in the military: The sky is falling.

Affordable health care for all, including those with pre-existing conditions and very expensive diseases: The sky is falling. Really?

MARTHA BARRETT SCOTT

Grand Junction

 

City officials should examine success of Montrose Pavilion

I appreciate the letter suggesting the Pikes Peak Center as an example of what this city needs, as opposed to an expanded Avalon Theatre, though the Pikes Peak Center appears to be much more than this community needs or could support.

We don’t have to look that far from home for a modest and achievable arts/music center. Consider the Montrose Pavilion. Picture it expanded 50 percent more than its original size, with a spacious, comfortable concert hall, conference rooms, convenient parking and other modern amenities.

Grand Junction draws from surrounding communities and deserves a better facility to offer guests and us. I am disappointed that hard-to-come-by funds are being thrown at the Avalon, which I suspect is someone’s pet.

REBECCA MALEY

Grand Junction



COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1


Sentinel readers are lucky to be able to read an example of classic “lib” talking points and discussion style in the letter from Jane & Andy Goldman.
First we have the term “wild histrionics”, which can fairly be construed to include any opining with which the “oh-so-benign” Goldmans disagree.
Next is the sentence, “we are a civilized people who embrace the notion that all individuals have the essential human right to access basic medical care.” Obviously, people who disagree with the Goldmans are not “civilized”. Regarding the “essential human right to access basic medical care”, there is already excellent access to medical care in America, so what the Goldman’s are referring to is either free or sliding-scale taxpayer-subsidized medical care. It logically follows that the Goldmans believe it is possible for person A to have a moral claim to ownership of the labor of person B, a notion I and millions of other Americans reject out of hand as absurd and counterproductive as a societal model.
“Will people take advantage of the public good will?” Does a bear go to the bathroom in the woods? Will any sane person work if you pay him not to work? A purely rhetorical question posed as sincerely hopeful and full of starry-eyed innocence.
“Soc Sec was not [popular] ... but we have come to accept it.” Truth is, millions of Americans now recognize SS for the mathematically unsustainable Ponzi scheme it has become. There are 4 arithmetic factors to SS: retirement age, money paid in as “contributions”, money paid out as “benefits”, and average age of death. Easy to understand.
One of the Left’s favorite canards is “affordable” health care. “Affordable” is in the eye of the purchaser. Does “affordable” mean you get to steal the price from somebody else; does it means doctors are forced to work for less money? It’s not such an easy and convenient word when you look at it like that, is it?
Considering the fact our only defense against an unaffordably high price of anything is the free-market right to not buy it, and considering the massive government-enabled corruption inherent in the global debt-as-money fraud, I cannot imagine any sane and reasonably intelligent person consciously choosing to letting a bunch of politicians and bureaucrats make these kinds of decisions for us.

Page 1 of 1







Search More Jobs






THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Sign in to your account
Information

© 2013 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy