Rec center organizers have earned their shot

We have to hand it to the dogged citizens who want to see a community/recreation center built in Grand Junction.

They threw their support behind a proposal for a quarter-cent sales tax hike to fund construction of a downtown event center. The project was hoped to inject $30 million of direct new spending annually into the local economy. Projected growth in tax revenues from this economic activity was supposed to put the city in a financial position to consider “extras,” like a recreation center.

When voters rejected that plan in April, the group behind the community center/rec center wasn’t derailed. They already had their contingency in place. A year ago, members of PLACE, People for Local and Community Enrichment, asked the city to consider building a recreation center. The council directed members to return when they could demonstrate support for the facility and had a plan for their proposal.

They returned earlier this week, 100 supporters in tow, having secured $25,000 in commitments for a feasibility study, contingent upon obtaining a matching grant from the state Department of Local Affairs. PLACE organizers pointed to survey data, a Facebook page with 1,000 followers and signatures of 2,000 supporters as proof high interest in a center.

The council agreed Monday to apply to DOLA for the matching funds, helping PLACE clear a preliminary hurdle. But many more remain. If the DOLA grant comes through, bigger challenges loom — not the least of which is devising a funding scheme. Voters have rejected a tax hike packaged as an economic stimulus. A recreation center has no economic upside. At best, it won’t be a budgetary burden — meaning fees might cover its operating costs — but it won’t create a ripple throughout the economy.

That’s not to say it doesn’t have value. The question is whether voters would consider supporting a tax measure for something that’s strictly a quality-of-life amenity with no ancillary economic benefits. The feasibility study should provide some answers — or at least a starting point to gauge public opinion.

Council members did the right thing supporting the feasibility study, even if some of them expressed reservations about the project’s long-term prospects. If the proposed center has as much support as PLACE organizers suggest, momentum will carry the plan forward, even if there’s no appetite for a tax measure. That could mean a capital fundraising campaign.

One way or another, we’ll get to the bottom of whether this is something people truly want. The feasibility study — considering needs, possible location and potential opportunities — is the first step. PLACE organizers deserve a shot to see if their vision for the community has broad support.


COMMENTS

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


TOP JOBS
Search More Jobs





THE DAILY SENTINEL
734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Editions
Subscribe to print edition
E-edition
Advertisers
Advertiser Tearsheet
eTear Sheets/ePayments
Information

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy