Rowland’s approach is wrong for business

Thanks for visiting The Daily Sentinel

Subscribers and registered users, log in to continue reading for free*

Forgot your password?    

Register to read for free! Become a subscriber

* 7-day subscribers have unlimited access to online content.
Registered users may read 12 articles per month.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

A lot happened on Janet’s watch with the BOCC sleeping at the switch, it appears.  Had the BOCC put responsible folks, rather than paying back political favor, on certain boards for instance, perhaps more public monies might be available.

I guess I didn’t get the memo that one had to be running for office to take a position on an issue. The reason I weighed in on the matter is two-fold is because as new board members are elected they are not always aware of previous agreements. And the public is often unaware of decisions that are made when the media doesn’t attend important meetings, as was the case several years ago when the county was asked to support the Fruit and Wine Byway.

My comments weren’t a reflection of the importance of ag or tourism to our economy, but rather the fairness of favoring one industry over others with regards to road improvements.

When any other businesses (who also support our economy)build or expand they are required by the city and the county to cover costs of transportation improvements. If the belief is that the county or city should cover those costs with existing revenue, and not expect the businesses to pay those costs, then that position should apply to all businesses, and not just those in the ag and tourism industry.

The editorial completely overlooks other industries in Mesa County that support our economy. The energy industry is a significant economic driver for Mesa County. In terms of well-paying jobs, wages in the energy industry far exceed those in ag or tourism.  Taxes paid by the energy industry also far exceed those of taxes paid by ag.  In addition to paying the highest rate of taxes of all businesses in Colorado, the energy industry pays to build or maintain the roads they use.  Chevron paid several million to improve the road north of Debeque in Garfield County.  The Mesa County Road and Bridge Department works agreements with all the energy companies to keep and maintain the roads they use.  For every road the energy industry uses, they either provide the funds to help the County to maintain or maintain the roads themselves.

If we are going to take the position that because ag and tourism are good for our economy therefore we shouldn’t expect them to pay their fair share for road improvements, then we should apply that to all industries and refund the millions spent by every other businesses when they developed.

The energy industry, as a sole economic driver, has never done us well.  It is too subject to boom-and-bust cycles.  Your failure to be sufficiently forward-thinking about the merits of a diversified economy are the main reason it has taken Mesa County longer than other places in Colorado to recover from the latest bust.

We need energy.  But we also need tourism and manufacturing.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
Subscribe to print edition
Sign in to your account

© 2014 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy