TABOR item can win 
if properly worded

Members of the Grand Junction City Council and city officials who had hoped voters would approve an override to TABOR Amendment revenue limits Tuesday to provide the city additional funding for transportation projects should be encouraged by the election results.

Even though Referred Measure B failed on Tuesday, it was defeated by just 160 votes.

One can infer from this that voters in the city remain willing to consider reasonable funding proposals for needed infrastructure, just as they did when they approved the tax plan for Riverside Parkway in 2005 and again in 2008 when they approved a TABOR override to pay off the parkway early.

Measure B on this year’s ballot asked voters to allow the city to keep the extra revenue from the parkway project once that project is paid off, perhaps as early as 2015, and apply it to other transportation projects.

The problem with Measure B was that it lacked specifics. Voters didn’t know for sure which projects would be funded in what timeframe, how much they would cost or for how many years the additional funding would be needed. Additionally, because the parkway bonds won’t be paid off for at least two more years, the measure seemed premature.

Based on the narrow defeat of Measure B, it seems likely that a more specific TABOR override measure in a couple of years — one that includes a prioritized projects list, costs and a guaranteed sunset date — would find favor with voters.


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy