The minimum wage battle and the failure of trickle-down economics

“You know what that means when someone pays you minimum wage? You know what your boss was trying to say? ‘Hey, if I could pay you less, I would, but it’s against the law.’”

— Chris Rock

Almost everyone in this country earns less than our 1970s counterparts. And we all need a raise.

Amid the commotion of November’s election, Colorado voters quietly approved Amendment 70. Colorado’s minimum wage will now rise steadily: from $8.31 in 2016 to $9.30 in 2017, and up $0.90 each year until 2020, when it reaches $12. The minimum wage will then rise with the Consumer Price Index.

Prior to November 2016, the proposed minimum wage increase was met by a familiar argument: “Raising wages will hurt workers through layoffs or inflation. Let the market work it out!” Detractors compared the price and demand of labor to other things, like, say, Cheerios: if the price of Cheerios is too high, fewer people will buy Cheerios. “It’s Economics 101,” they said.

The problem is that labor is nothing like Cheerios, and “Economics 101” shouldn’t be applied to labor costs. Employee loyalty, motivation, experience, efficiency over time, and institutional knowledge make labor more difficult to value than a box of cereal. You’ll stop buying cereal when it gets too expensive. But you need labor no matter what, and will pay more for loyal, motivated, smart, and efficient employees.

Yet, we are told over and over to “Let the market work it out!” which really means: “Back off these companies! They’ll take care of us.” This is the central principle of trickle-down economics: money should be allocated to owners, who can then hire more workers and pay better wages. Ronald Reagan popularized the trickle-down theory in the 1980s, and it has since become the rallying cry of fiscal conservatives. (This rallying cry is at times accompanied with a slight at workers: “If workers get paid too much, they’ll get lazy and stop working!”) Trickle-down sounds great in theory, but economic data show it does not work, and has never worked. The logical flaw is well-stated by economist John Kenneth Galbraith: “We can safely abandon the doctrine of the (1980s), namely that the rich were not working because they had too little money, the poor because they had much.”

Adherence to trickle-down principles by both major parties has led to increasing economic inequality and strife. More wealth is pooled amongst fewer people than at any time in history. The U.S. minimum wage is the lowest of any advanced economy. Minimum-wage workers can barely afford housing (see the National Low Income Housing Coalition’s “Out of Reach” study), not to mention the increasing costs of healthcare, food, and education.

Simply put: people are paid less, and things cost more, than in generations past.

Now, in anticipation of the argument that “some burger flipper” shouldn’t earn more than a nurse, or member of the military, or whatever profession, let me be clear: I am not advocating only increasing minimum-wage workers’ earnings, at the expense of other hardworking people. All working people should earn more money. These goals are not mutually exclusive. We all deserve a raise.

This isn’t merely a touchy-feely position, but an urge to increase the “velocity of money.” When workers are paid more, they spend more in the local community. Businesses have more customers. Businesses then create more jobs. That’s a fundamental economic law. A thriving working class is not a consequence of economic growth. It’s a source of growth.

The city of Seattle passed a minimum-wage increase similar to Colorado’s in November 2014, steadily moving the wage up to $15 hourly beginning January 2017. The pre-increase arguments by fiscal conservatives were the classics: the increase would cause layoffs and cripple the city’s employers. But close observation by the University of Washington’s Evans School has shown the opposite: so far, workers are earning (and spending) more, and businesses are succeeding (and failing) at the same rate as they used to. These are good signs for Colorado’s wage initiative.

For a society that “values hard work,” it’s baffling that workers organizing to ask for raises are called “greedy” or “lazy.” The working class builds our houses. They grow, cook, and serve our food. They sell us our clothes and computers, and keep our communities safe and clean. They take care of our kids, of us when we are sick, of our parents when they age. I am glad that Colorado voters agreed to give all of us a raise, and look forward to the positive effect on our economy.


Sean Goodbody is a Grand Junction attorney representing injured workers all over western Colorado. He welcomes your comments at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
Page 1 of 1

PART 1. (I also posted this two-part comment on the Mesa County Patriots Facebook page.)
“Almost everyone in this country earns less than our 1970s counterparts. And we all need a raise….All working people should earn more money…We all deserve a raise.” ~ Sean Goodbody, Esq.
I can’t remember hearing a more Economics-101 ignorant statement from a lawyer, or, in fact, from any other type of person, period.
I was going to be a little more ad hominem and say, “I have never heard a more stupid statement in my life,” but I wanted to try to “play nice”, so we’ll stick with the phrase “Economics-101 ignorant”.
The fraud of the so-called “minimum wage” is like a dog chasing its tail.
Wages are part of overhead, and when you increase them, you automatically increase the price of the goods and services everybody else buys, which, in turn, causes everybody to think they need even “more monetary numbers” (aka an increase in wages) to keep up with the higher new prices.
The main symptom—let’s even say cause—of the real problem is what I call the Producer/Consumer Glitch: without exception, every human being wants to get paid as much as possible for his or her labor while simultaneously paying as little as possible for the labor of The Other. “Cheap” is good, “free” is even better.
The ONLY logical and fair way to handle this immense conundrum is for everybody to make their exchanges VOLUNTARILY in an atmosphere/marketplace 100% devoid of coercion of any kind.
Under the present self-evidently UNSUSTAINABLE system, instead of producing widgets at a profit and selling them to willing buyers, we all (at least the more criminal-minded among us) insanely compete for “government” Power with which to pass special rules benefiting us to the detriment of The Other. E.g. vote for me and I will raise your so-called “minimum wage”. Cool, huh?!
The idiotically fallacious and simplistic statement, “everybody should earn more money” is tantamount to saying, “everybody should have more stuff” or “everything should cost twice as many monetary numbers”.
As comedian George Carlin used to say, that way we can all build even bigger houses to put our “stuff” in, so we can go out and buy more “stuff”!

PART 2. “Money” is a banker-coined word designed to obfuscate the life-v-death, freedom-v-slavery difference between inflexible accurately measurable commodity mediums of exchange and flexible political-power-based, musical-chairs-type monetary-number mediums of exchange which facilitate systemic theft by the clever and criminal-minded of the labor of the more gullible and naive.
“All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, so much as from the downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation.” ~ John Adams
Interested individuals who want to understand America’s monetary/tax problems should read my historical essay titled “The Big Lie” at
Unfortunately, the last place on Earth people who want to understand money should look is in the Good Old Daily Sentinel or the opinions of Sean Goodbody—at least not until he bothers to learn a little more about the subject he is trying to enlighten us on.

Page 1 of 1

Search More Jobs

734 S. Seventh St.
Grand Junction, CO 81501
970-242-5050; M-F 8:00 - 5:00
Subscribe to print edition
eTear Sheets/ePayments

© 2017 Grand Junction Media, Inc.
By using this site you agree to the Visitor Agreement and the Privacy Policy