New plan recognizes role of private landowners in species conservation
Conservation cannot be a short-term project.
Whether it means the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation protecting prime elk habitat in northwest Colorado or ranchers protecting greater sage grouse habitat around De Beque, conservation cannot be accomplished without giving landowners some promise of long-term stability.
In themselves these thoughts are not new. What’s new, however, is a plan unveiled earlier this week by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Natural Resources Conservation Service to provide conservation-minded landowners with funding and long-term security.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Working Lands for Wildlife initiative offers private landowners the opportunity to voluntarily implement habitat conservation practices for several at-risk and vulnerable game species.
The key provisions in the plan include its length, 30 years instead of the current 10-year duration; the broad geographical ranges of the species being protected; and its funding, which this year totals $33 million for on-the-ground work.
The money will go to landowners developing and implementing conservation plans on high-priority habitats for seven specific wildlife species across the country.
The species are greater sage grouse, New England cottontail, bog turtle, golden-winged warbler, gopher tortoise, lesser prairie chicken and the Southwestern willow flycatcher.
“This unique agreement recognizes that species conservation works best when private landowners are committed and active partners in the process,” said Whit Fosburgh, president and CEO of the Teddy Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “It makes funds available to help implement important projects and guarantees to landowners that the government won’t keep moving the goal line.”
The plan offers so-called “safe harbor” assurances to landowners, Fosburgh said, speaking recently at the High Lonesome Ranch near De Beque.
“If a landowner undertakes conservation projects that work and a listed species moves onto his or her lands, or if a resident nonlisted species like sage grouse subsequently becomes listed under the Endangered Species Act, that landowner can be confident that he or she won’t suddenly be subject to new restrictions or penalties,” Fosburgh said.
Such assurance means a great deal to landowners such as High Lonesome Ranch owner Paul Vahldiek. He said the new plan gives conservation-minded landowners the ability to plan without worrying about future costly regulations.
“It’s hard to try to take care of the land into the future when you don’t know what’s going to happen five or 10 years ahead,” said Vahldieck. “What happens if I improve habitat and suddenly the sage grouse is listed” under the Endangered Species Act?
“Taking this landscape approach is the secret to having these lands productive and species protected 50 years into the future.”
The Working Lands for Wildlife initiative “reflects the direction we need to go and want to go in the future,” Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe said. “It’s important for agriculture and important for species conservation. It represents a great step forward and how we need to continue doing business moving forward.”
Ashe emphasized conservation cannot occur without the cooperation of private landowners.
“If we can’t get the private landowners to buy in now, some of these species won’t last,” he said. “We cannot conserve certain species without working with private landowners.”
As Fosburgh noted, this program also benefits sportsmen.
“Conserving and restoring sage grouse directly benefits mule deer and pronghorn, which share the same habitats,” Fosburgh said.
Also, because almost half of all Americans hunt only on private lands, ensuring the health and productivity of these lands by giving landowners adequate resources and long-term regulatory security “is in everyone’s best interests,” he said.
Odicil earchilignis reperest que con plabo. Ehendicia sinulla nihitatur, id maximil itectorum rempor autecatem sam eaquo quam exerchil inctat doles et, nimodis vidus eost praeperitat autemquo conserum, et et et lab ipideli cimus, id quistin conse elenisc iaesequas velique ipsae cum ad exped ut quam res ut voluptibus re voluptas ma qui cum eosam, cusa que volor assed eictis sitatur? Qui arum et od et liatur?
Gende latus. Ant, quod que labori aut eossum inverfe rferferibus es volendit porem ducia cupitasitia consequo inumquost eritinveris dent es asinverrum ellab iur ad essin raepelestem volendandae disquo eum lam non necturior amenia volorestio oditiore cum quiatiam, quuntur aut resequiam natiam quo blatior repelit, quistiis sunditius, quos pro odigenit apic temquia voluptas quis volorro tenis mintiori comniendus mo to quas conectatios sequi asperum volendae sa quis ate con pres aut magnist, ut voluptatem fugiand elitate stionse ndaerum isciis con cum aut elest lab iur, cor aut earum doluptatet aut etur aut earum dolesti atiume doluptatur, odi ut ad eturionseni suscitatis maiore, natur molut aciis et et faccaborit as delendendi odicia in re comnis doloribus, que porios dolorup tatem. Cerovitat delent qui od mo et vellit et occat laccum nobit, sequidi psuntoreped excea sitatinctem et labores aut la comnis alitis nonsectur serchic te ma volorepernam que qui alibus porit quae nonsequi dolora sunt.
Cipid que pos acculpa cum res quo vollacepe nimi, odia dolum solupta quo voluptas incium nisciis et quamus quas autecea qui dios mi, ium dus, aut rae lacepudio vitatur, incto exceptatust eum, quatiur? Iquist ex et occum facearc iendeni eniminihicim cons